Do you always focus like this, on your experience in dealing with the matter at hand? Like, if from your experience the practice has shown itself to be valid you use it? Also, is the way you establish validity through practical application and not through studying the internal (in)consistency of the matter, as in, mathematically making and then studying a model of something?This is the method I use because it tends to be more accurate for me. I've used it for many different relationships with my type, and it was more like my relations IRL with this method.
But it seems to have more weight in real life and actual relationships in the cases that I have used it, rather than if I just used the same code from MBTI.
I second this notion. I don't think socionics and MBTI types of people correspond to a relevant degree.And I actually really doubt that it (socionics type) corresponds to MBTI most of the time;
Regarding socionics, one should be careful regarding people who present themselves as authorities. This site is a nice example of this, it's tends to be largely crackpot and yet one could easily perceive it as a source of validity.But, if you know a lot about socionics, then I'll listen to your reasoning; I have not researched it quite as much as I have MBTI.