Go Back   Typology Central > The Commune > The SP Arthouse

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2008, 03:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
6sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Type: istp
Posts: 409
6sticks is unique just like everyone else
Cool Famous Historical SPs

You know the drill.
__________________
In pursuit of happiness.
6sticks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 03:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Type: INTP
Location: The Everlasting Sky
Posts: 9,359
Jack Flak is unique just like everyone else
Default

Dubya
Jack Flak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 03:56 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
6sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Type: istp
Posts: 409
6sticks is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flak View Post
Dubya
Can't really be historical if you're still alive... even assuming he is an SP.
__________________
In pursuit of happiness.
6sticks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 04:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Type: INTP
Location: The Everlasting Sky
Posts: 9,359
Jack Flak is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6sticks View Post
Can't really be historical if you're still alive... even assuming he is an SP.
But you see, NTs don't think in terms of the present. We are but passing through history. Oh, and I voted for the guy (lesser of two weevils), so don't think it's an insult.
Jack Flak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 04:17 AM   #5 (permalink)
Metalife
 
Colors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: ISTP
Location: Among the jasmine
Posts: 1,051
Colors is unique just like everyone else
Default

Is it bad that my first kneejerk reaction was to say Evel Knievel? I gotta stop reading those horrible cheesy MBTI descriptions.

Guess I don't usually think about historical figures in MBTI terms.
__________________
"In their youth, no one realizes that the trees that stretch into the sky are, at the same time, sending their roots deeper and deeper into the earth." - Noriko Ogiwara
Colors is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 12:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
RIP
 
Jeffster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Type: isFp
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 4,516
Jeffster is unique just like everyone else
Default

Well, according to Keirsey, we've got a good amount of the US presidents, including Grant, both Roosevelts, Kennedy, and Reagan. As well as Winston Churchill over there across the pond. I'm sure many kings and queens probly were, I think I've heard Henry the Eighth.
__________________
Jeffster Illustrates the Artisan Temperament <---- click here

"You are a wise man, O Jeffster of the Innerwebz." -- Pink Piranha
Jeffster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 01:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
"?"
Senior Member
 
"?"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ISTP
Posts: 1,161
"?" is unique just like everyone else
Default

Red Adair and Ty Cobb were ISTPs from what I have heard.
__________________
A witty saying proves nothing. - Voltaire
"?" is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 03:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Gabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: ENTP
Posts: 586
Gabe is unique just like everyone else
Default

Abe Lincoln

I think Grant was an INTJ. The battles that he led in the civil war had incredibly high death tolls, but he was known to faint at the sight of blood.
Gabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 03:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
"?"
Senior Member
 
"?"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ISTP
Posts: 1,161
"?" is unique just like everyone else
Default

That makes no sense Gabe. What does fainting at the sight of blood have to do with type? From all I have read, I think that Lincoln was some sort of intuitive (most likely INT) and Grant was clearly an SP:
Quote:
After the Mexican-American war ended in 1848, Grant remained in the army and was moved to several different posts. He was sent to Fort Vancouver in the Washington Territory in 1853, where he served as quartermaster of the 4th Infantry Regiment. His wife, eight months pregnant with their second child, could not accompany him because his salary could not support a family on the frontier. In 1854, Grant was promoted to captain (one of only 50 still on active duty) and assigned to command Company F, 4th Infantry, at Fort Humboldt, California. However, he still could not afford to bring his family out West. He tried some business ventures, but they failed. Grant resigned from the Army with little advance notice on July 31, 1854, offering no explanation for his abrupt decision. Rumors persisted in the Army for years that his commanding officer, Bvt. Lt. Col. Robert C. Buchanan, found him drunk on duty as a pay officer and offered him the choice between resignation or court-martial.[9] Some biographers discount the rumors and suggest Grant's resignation, and his drinking, were both prompted by profound depression. According to this view, Buchanan hated Grant and concocted the drunkenness story years later to protect Buchanan's action in removing the man who became one of the most famous generals in history. The War Department stated, "Nothing stands against his good name."[10]

A civilian at age 32, Grant struggled through seven lean years. From 1854 to 1858 he labored on a family farm near St. Louis, Missouri, using slaves owned by his father-in-law, but it did not prosper. Grant owned one slave (whom he set free in 1859); his wife owned four slaves (two women servants and their two small boys).[11] In 1858-59 he was a bill collector in St. Louis. Failing at everything, in humiliation he asked his father for a job, and in 1860 was made an assistant in the leather shop owned by his father and run by his younger brother in Galena, Illinois. Grant & Perkins sold harnesses, saddles, and other leather goods and purchased hides from farmers in the prosperous Galena area.[12]

Although Grant was essentially apolitical, his father-in-law was a prominent Democrat in St. Louis (a fact that lost Grant the good job of county engineer in 1859). In 1856 he voted for Democrat James Buchanan for president to avert secession and because "I knew Frémont" (the Republican candidate). In 1860, he favored Democrat Stephen A. Douglas but did not vote. In 1864, he allowed his political sponsor, Congressman Elihu B. Washburne, to use his private letters as campaign literature for Abraham Lincoln[13] and the Union Party, which combined both Republicans and War Democrats. He refused to announce his political affiliation until 1868, when he finally declared himself a Republican.
__________________
A witty saying proves nothing. - Voltaire
"?" is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 04:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
"?"
Senior Member
 
"?"'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ISTP
Posts: 1,161
"?" is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffster View Post
Well, according to Keirsey, we've got a good amount of the US presidents, including Grant, both Roosevelts, Kennedy, and Reagan. As well as Winston Churchill over there across the pond. I'm sure many kings and queens probly were, I think I've heard Henry the Eighth.
Interesting tidbits on FDR and JFK (note the first similarity being they were renowned for their initials). Both suffered from debilitating injuries/illnesses during their childhoods and teen years although JFK’s was less publicly known. Kennedy was injected daily with pain killers while in the White House and was known to have been addicted. Also the back brace that he was wearing in Dallas kept him erected as a target, after the first shot hit him in the shoulder. Maybe in lieu of or due to the illnesses both families of FDR and JFK purport them to have been reserved and detached when home. They both reluctantly entered public politics due to strong family grooming. Both had seemingly arranged marriages (Eleanor and Jackie) wherein they both became philanderers.

Since it’s my understanding that MBTI enthusiasts consider them both ESTPs, are these similarities mere coincidences or can any of the ESTPs relate on some level in particularly of having the Jekyll/Hyde persona with their immediate families, having to remain in an unloved but highly pragmatic relationship (maybe unloved is too harsh since I am sure both men may have confused love with very much respecting their spouses), etc?
__________________
A witty saying proves nothing. - Voltaire
"?" is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Famous historical NT's substitute The NT Rationale 85 06-19-2009 09:54 AM
Famous historical NF's substitute The NF Idyllic 41 02-02-2009 12:26 AM
Famous historical SP/SJ's substitute The SJ Guardhouse 5 09-03-2008 04:39 PM
What historical figure do you admire most? mippus Politics, History, and Current Events 22 04-07-2008 06:02 PM
Famous WWE Wrestlers SeanMC86 Popular Culture and Type 0 03-03-2008 02:09 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Donate via Paypal
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0