Hey I hope you don’t mind me piping in with an opinion despite not knowing you. But I have seen enough of your threads to be bewildered as to why you are entertaining the notion of ESI. First things first, there is no such thing as sophisticated Se; Se and Si are tied directly to traditional masculinity and femininity respectively. Se is concerned with money and power, Si is concerned with aesthetics and refinement.
Now while an ESI could be refined they would do it with Gamma values in place. Gammas want money, moral authority and power, if they had a motto it would be “might is rightâ€, the idea that because they have power they have moral authority over those beneath them. For example the ESI who always dresses and acts appropriately at work in hopes of gaining a promotion, while outside of work couldn’t care less for either.
This is why I am confused because the threads that you post, that I have read are usually aesthetic based. You seem to enjoy the beauty and poignancy of the things you post; which is to say you post without agenda, which is an alpha quality.
I wonder if you are possible mixing up JCF and socionics? The functions are different in socionics due to its piss poor attempt at outside observation and trait based groupings. For instance socionics Si would be a combination of a chunk of Jung’s Se description, combined with about half of the Ni description (the part about art, aesthetics, and the potential for development into moralistic stances.), and a dash of Si. Alternatively have you read the SEI descriptions particularly those by that moron Beskova (not that any of them are that good really), and said to yourself hey I’m not a 1950’s housewife?
Yeah this puts you in the realm of SEI, inert and a lack of concern about control is pretty Alpha.
awesome.
