|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Silence the discord
Join Date: Jul 2007
Type: eNtj
Location: Where
Posts: 1,944
![]() |
I'd like to see cold fusion and hyperspace travel
__________________
![]() I am not Christ or a philanthropist, old lady, I am all the contrary of a Christ....
I fight for the things I believe in, with all the weapons at my disposal and try to leave the other man dead so that I don't get nailed to a cross or any other place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Type: DUDE
Posts: 724
![]() |
I was thinking neuroscience and robotics, which i forgot to add.
There is quantum computering also Quote:
I entirely agree. Quote:
How many of us get to be in jobs that develops cutting edge technologies? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Type: DUDE
Posts: 724
![]() |
I have a hunch the first AI breakthroughs will happen in Japan, not the U.S.
Japan is really advanced in the field of robotics. PS this thread is just a brainstorm of which science i should go into in university. and how do you turn this thread into a poll?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
-
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: ISTP
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 899
![]() |
Most of the interesting new developments are (not surprisingly) happening at the interfaces of the fields you list. For example, my own research combines nanotechnology, engineering, physics, and chemistry. Some of my associates are at the interface of nanotechnology, engineering, and biochemistry.
The boundaries between the fields are artificial and useless, except for taking classes. To excel in science, you've got to incorporate all kinds of techniques and technologies. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: XNXP
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,042
![]() |
Of course not. We're just speculating here. The period of time in question is so long - an entire century. Considering the rate that technology speeds along, further empowering us to speed along, it may turn out that some kind of applied Neuro-Psychology becomes more important than any "technology" ( as conceived of as being a manipulation of things outside of "us" ) as we finally start getting into the nitty gritty of our own minds studying themselves, and thus our real motivations and the implications thereof.
__________________
"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them that they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." Reichsfuhrer Herman Goering at the Nuremburg trials. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Crazy Bean
Join Date: May 2007
Type: ENTJ
Posts: 2,795
![]() |
Most potential? Potential for what? Immortality (or something close to it) would alter civilization more than anything else, so I'm going to say genetics/biology/nanotechnology.
__________________
It's all about me. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Situation of Faith in God or Science | nonsequitur | Other Psychology Topics | 6 | 12-20-2008 01:16 AM |
| (Perhaps Controversial) Thoughts on Different Kinds of Science | ygolo | Science, Technology, and Future Tech | 21 | 11-14-2008 12:07 PM |
| Are you a materialist or a dualist? | ajblaise | Philosophy and Spirituality | 69 | 11-10-2008 02:36 AM |
| Can general public understand position of modern science? | Antisocial one | Science, Technology, and Future Tech | 39 | 10-24-2008 01:48 AM |
| Which field of science holds the most potential in the coming century | cloud | Science, Technology, and Future Tech | 28 | 09-29-2008 06:05 PM |