@ygolo I never said that I wanted to steralize 10% of the population either, I started on this thread by saying I thought limiting their birth after a certain point was a good idea.
Instead of asking me what I think like an intelligient adult, you just keep trying to trap me in what I've already said, lol.
Here's fresh start.
I simply think that genetic manipulation, in theory, is good.
I am not familiar with the history of what has happened with eugenics in communistic countries.
No, I do not think that Joseph Stalin's ghost should come back and kill all of the mentally handiapped people.
I do think that the idea of reducing mentally handicapped people is good.
Because of that belief, I would advocate research on the subject of manipulation.
Like I said, i understand that tampering with genes is dangerous.
I get that for this to be done in an ethical manner, I would have to happen quite gradually.
I also know that communism has not worked in the past 100 years.
No, I am no going to start a communist movement.
Any other questions?
EDIT: I just saw your last edit. I agree mostly. I mean I guess if it were really that cut and dry then I don't have one. I made my earlier point under the assumption that the better genes could be isolated. Either way though, research can never be a bad thing.
Now I'm starting to see what I believe to be your point. That eugenics movements have good intentions, but they are mislead and will not achieve what they set out to do. Just like communism.