User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. #1
    Senior Member Mal12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    IxTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    13,989

    Default The Sum of All Natural Numbers = -1/12

    "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
    “Culture?” says Paul McCartney. “This isn't culture. It's just a good laugh.”

  2. #2
    Senior Member Mal12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    IxTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    13,989

    Default

    I know the mathematician on the left looks hideous. But if anybody's watched the video, do you have an explanation for the move from step 1 to step 2?
    "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
    “Culture?” says Paul McCartney. “This isn't culture. It's just a good laugh.”

  3. #3
    Just a note... LittleV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w3
    Socionics
    IEI
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Essentially, you can do anything to an equation as long as you'd keep it balanced. You can 'prove' your own assumption(s) or use one(s) that has been proven. The aim is to continually get the numbers into a condensed enough form to properly solve. In S2: Adding the equation to itself has been shown as valid as well as the process of shifting it... since you are not changing any of the values. Any mathematical proof is valid unless a part of it can be disproved.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mal12345's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    MBTI
    IxTP
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Socionics
    LII Ti
    Posts
    13,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LittleV View Post
    Essentially, you can do anything to an equation as long as you'd keep it balanced. You can 'prove' your own assumption(s) or use one(s) that has been proven. The aim is to continually get the numbers into a condensed enough form to properly solve. In S2: Adding the equation to itself has been shown as valid as well as the process of shifting it... since you are not changing any of the values. Any mathematical proof is valid unless a part of it can be disproved.
    You say that shifting the lower series when adding them is "as valid as" balancing an equation. That's true because nothing has been added to the second series, it's just a null value at the beginning of the series. Adding nothing to a series doesn't change the series.

    There is more to the proof, it has to do with convergent and divergent series. The idea is to cause the sum of the two series to converge, but the theory behind this is not included in the video.
    "Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
    “Culture?” says Paul McCartney. “This isn't culture. It's just a good laugh.”

  5. #5
    Just a note... LittleV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w3
    Socionics
    IEI
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mal12345 View Post
    You say that shifting the lower series when adding them is "as valid as" balancing an equation. That's true because nothing has been added to the second series, it's just a null value at the beginning of the series. Adding nothing to a series doesn't change the series.

    There is more to the proof, it has to do with convergent and divergent series. The idea is to cause the sum of the two series to converge, but the theory behind this is not included in the video.
    I wouldn't compare the two; some notions are more likely to be disproved than others... balancing is not one that is in question. Yes... adding the series to itself and multiplying the 'S2' by two is keeping it balanced. When you'd shift the second row to add the numbers... this is a rule that many are taken aback by initially (so I thought I'd mention that). It's deemed as valid in itself because none of the individual values would be changed in doing so -- the top and bottom would always equal one another. There is more than just 'balancing' involved here... but it seems solid so far.

Similar Threads

  1. The sum of all our parts
    By King sns in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-26-2011, 07:00 PM
  2. I'm new, but I'm not sure I understand the point of all this...
    By thedusen in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 02:38 AM
  3. The Jack of All Types
    By LucrativeSid in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-17-2008, 09:50 PM
  4. for the benefit of all mankind
    By entropie in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 10:45 AM
  5. The Human Mind - the sum of its parts or something more?
    By Geoff in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-15-2007, 06:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO