I agree with Eck, a theory about states and circles hasnt any real connection so far and therefore seems a bit like hovering over experimental physics. But well there's a reason people differentiate between theorethical and experimental ( tho I'ld like to add philosophical to that list, cause many things have no real connection to physics or astronomy ).
Maybe you want to read more about M-theory or membrane - theory, it deals a bit with the thing you are proposing. The idea is that there are multiple layers of spacetime out there, which lay like satin on top of each others, influencing each others. This idea originated from an explanation attempt regarding the gravitational force, which is according to theory a force that could exist in all layers of dimension and that could be the case why it's only so weak in our dimension, where we experience it.
I've found the circle you drew to religion, very ridicioulus, tho I find your attempt of doing so very brave. If you dig a bit into electromagnetism, you'll find that there are some constants in the universe. Like for example the Planck constant. This is a fundamental constant necessary for energy to exist, if it had been of any different value, energy as we know it wouldnt have the proportions it has and prolly couldnt have formed matter. Next to that there's the gravitational constant, which if it was only a slight bit of would have made it impossible for our solar system to form, so would have made it impossible for the planets to revolve around the sun like they do.
This phenomna you could use for a religious interpretation, like "did God set the values ?!" Physics say the bigbang happened multiple times, like a billion times, before a state was achieved in which it was possible for the universe to exist like it does today. I tend to believe physics on this but who knows maybe it was God ? Or Hankey, the christmas poo