User Tag List

View Poll Results: Merging our bodies with non-biological technology

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    37 82.22%
  • No

    8 17.78%
First 234

Results 31 to 40 of 40

  1. #31
    Senior Member Feops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    INTx
    Posts
    829

    Default

    Approve for medical purposes, but I'd rather see advancement in genetics - organ cloning and/or regeneration.

  2. #32
    Member Manis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    MBTI
    INFP
    Posts
    47

    Default

    I'm reading 'The Singularity Is Near' at the moment. Kurzweil seems a little overenthusiastic but it's hard to find fault in his reasoning, I'm convinced that these sort of technologies are coming sooner rather than later. It might seem a bit unnatural or un-human or icky to some people thinking about it now, but when the time comes and you have to make the choice between accepting these technologies and rejecting them and staying 100% 'human' I don't think there'll be many people opting for an early and unnecessary death.

  3. #33
    Senior Member paradox fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4
    Posts
    134

    Default

    I had a dream the other night about a mechanical exoskeleton that was controlled by the mind of a quadriplegic. When he woke up in the morning a machine would get him out of bed and put him into the mecha. Then later it got upgraded to an endoskeleton that was implanted over his muscles so that he could move again. Connected to the part of the spinal cord that still worked. It was a good dream.

    So I think using bionics, when necessary, is good. But if they take over us it won't be so good. I think we'll still be human, even mechanical bits included. (Does an amputee consider himself less than human just because of his artificial limb?) But to be DEPENDENT on them when it's unnecessary would suck. For instance if you get bionic eyes when your real eyes are just fine. You'd be dependent on the company for upgrades and who knows what kind of unwanted crap will come with it. Like ads filtering in. Argh.
    Just because I'm an INFP doesn't mean I'm emo!

  4. #34
    Senior Member Pixelholic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    8w7
    Posts
    571

    Default

    I'm down, bring on the transhumanism!
    “You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.” -Nietzsche

  5. #35
    Yup
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    MBTI
    Istj
    Posts
    1,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cloud View Post
    I envision in the future that robotics and technology will play a more and more important role in our society. We would one day intergrate technology(non-biological components) into our own bodies. Would make us less human?
    human mind robot body. sorta places you a little outside the human experience that many participate in, touch, smell, seeing,taste and sound. possibly?


    Quote Originally Posted by cloud View Post
    Do you support implanting machine parts into the human body to improve our abilities and performance, or do you oppose it? Would this move us more and more towards the Borg and less human?
    will technology homogenize the human experience, and take away our individuality making us borg like? good question. possibly
    legs and arms, fine but the brain? that is up to the individual.......could you imagine chatting with someone and seeing pop ups from visa or valtrex in your mind? i can see people taking liberties with advertising. maybe going back into your old memories and making their products glow brighter. imagine thinking about your moms final days, you and her but now suddenly in the corner, an extremely bright red can of pepsi and a bottle of mr clean. THIS MEMORY IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY PEPSI.

  6. #36
    Senior Member guesswho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Posts
    1,983

    Default

    Imagine your implant getting hacked.

  7. #37
    One day and the next Rainne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    MBTI
    ISTP
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by guesswho View Post
    Imagine your implant getting hacked.
    that sounds pretty interesting
    Weathergirl: District 38 is sunny. Slight rock showers this morning. Chance of rock showers into the afternoon—20 percent. District 39 is cloudy. Chance of rock showers this afternoon—10 percent.
    Edward: Bebop here here! Alright woo hoo!
    Weathergirl: Chance of rock showers today upgraded to 90 percent.
    Edward: Really.

  8. #38
    Junior Member Danikov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    Two
    Socionics
    ENFp
    Posts
    26

    Default

    As technology advances, I'd expect it to get smaller, more complex and more sophisticated until it rivals cells and 'life'. I'd argue we must integrate technology into ourselves as that's the only way to keep it human.

    What would you prefer? A super-intelligent human, or a super-intelligent machine?

  9. #39
    Senior Member fecaleagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    MBTI
    INTj
    Posts
    120

    Default

    I am all for it as long as it is a voluntary thing, and I see it being very commonplace. Unfortunately, I'm certain that the technology will be used against people's wills, and not necessarily for their benefit.

    As for making humans more cyborg-like or whatever, I think we are a century or two away from attaining significant technology in that regard, disregarding exogenous limiting of technological advancement.

    I see control of dysfunctional organs happening within 50 years, given the simplicity of their neuronal control. Integrating chips with the CNS I think, if even possible, would take many, many centuries (nearing a millennium). Personally I think that humans are not intelligent enough to be able to ever manipulate the brain; the best we can hope for is just to fully understand how it works, which will be a feat on its own. I see artificial eyes as a very likely possibility though. The sensory aspect of the brain is not so much the problem in my opinion, but motor output is just way too complex. Even when improving human attributes becomes possible, there will many limitations. Like the mechanical limitations of increased strength on our skeletal systems, so no superstrength

    And as for the hacking of the chips, I think with the future emerging of quantum computers, it will be an absolute impossibility to hack anything.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #40
    WTF is this dude saying? A Schnitzel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    INTP
    Socionics
    B.S.
    Posts
    1,155

    Default

    I thought this would be a hot or not poll.
    Quote Originally Posted by prplchknz View Post
    sheesh humans! for realz

Similar Threads

  1. [ENFJ] ENFJ+ESTP as lovers= yes or no?
    By Jonathanthegreat in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 06-23-2010, 03:55 AM
  2. Yes or No?
    By wolfy in forum The Fluff Zone
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 04:44 PM
  3. Preschool, Yes or No?
    By Tigerlily in forum Academics and Careers
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 01-07-2009, 12:18 AM
  4. Homeschooling: yes or no?
    By Oberon in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 04-04-2008, 06:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO