User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Feynman - QED (a must read on physics)

  1. #1
    Fail 2.0 Array BlueScreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008

    Default Feynman - QED (a must read on physics)

    I don┤t read very often, so me recommending a book is pretty unusual. I┤m an ENFP, so me telling people to read about Physics is even more unusual. There is one comforting thing though. You can feel safe knowing that if I believed this recommendation would scar you for life, my value system would not let me do it.

    Firstly this is for people interested in Physics. And I have recommended it, because in just over 100 pages of light reading, I now understand the fundamentals of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED), and what the LHC and standard model is all about. And in a way this book seems like something that should be a must before even commenting or being skeptical about people┤s searches for crazy particles.

    Richard Feynman was one of the most significant Physicists of the 20th century, and QED is one of the most significant theories of the 20th century. As he put it in the book, most of us are still back arguing the physics of the 1920s. We learn it in school. We are trained in the mistakes of it. And I think most people escape it to arguing relativity, quantum mechanics, etc. There are philosophy classes and physics students playing with issues that were gone before the 50s. And there┤s this great mysticism and media mess that obscures things that are actually quite simple. In fact after reading the book, QED seems far more intuitive and simple and obvious than the things we learn in school. The results of it can get crazily complicated, but I love the way Feynman sees the world.

    The book is quite an easy read for physics students/enthusiasts, NTs, and at a lesser level for the layman. It was actually aimed at the layman. And I┤m guessing will give the same insight to the layman, without maybe the same wow connections in understanding.

    Thanks for reading
    Freude, sch├Âner G├Âtterfunken Tochter aus Elysium, Wir betreten feuertrunken, Himmlische, dein Heiligtum! Deine Zauber binden wieder Was die Mode streng geteilt; Alle Menschen werden Br├╝der, Wo dein sanfter Fl├╝gel weilt.

  2. #2
    Nips away your dignity Array Fluffywolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    9 sp/sx


    This subject actually has been on my 'to-read-up-on...sometime' list for quite a while. Now with you pointing out a book that is very explanatory into it all, I feel I can't delay much longer.

    I'll move it to my 'to-read-on-short(ish)-notice' list.

  3. #3
    Habitual Fi LineStepper Array JocktheMotie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008


    Have you read Elegant Universe by Brian Greene? I had read that right before picking up QED and got through the first lecture and part of the second before it felt like a review instead of being something new. I may have to pick it up again.

  4. #4


    I read this one a long time ago, noigmn. Feynmann is usually an easy read, even for the hardest subject. He is well suited for writing about QED being on of its co-discoverers.

    You've inspired me to give it a second read.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  5. #5
    Mr. Blue Array entropie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    3w2 so


    Quote Originally Posted by ygolo View Post
    Feynmann is usually an easy read, even for the hardest subject.
    I only read books when I am on the toilet and I have to say I lost track of whats going on after page 30.

    I definitly need to start with book 1 instead of book 3
    Johari / Nohari

    "How dreadful!" cried Lord Henry. "I can stand brute force, but brute reason is quite unbearable. There is something unfair about its use. It is hitting below the intellect."
    ~ Oscar Wilde - The picture of Dorian Gray

  6. #6
    DoubleplusUngoodNonperson Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2008


    Today in my anct. philosophy class, our ENTP instructor referred to Feynman is "our lord and savior" for one reason: due to the nature of QM, people were actually considering throwing out the Law of Contradiction, because it was becoming common to think of the atom as being "a particle and also something that is not a particle" - problem of dual natures. Apparently, Feynman is supposed to have cleared up this business long ago, and he said a lot of physics these days is argued pre-Feynman. Will have to check him out

  7. #7
    pathwise dependent Array FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007


    Yes, it's an awesome book. I also reccommed Feynman lectures of physics, even if you have just an hobbish interest in physics. His explanations are extremely clear and simple (even if the subject is very complex).
    ENTj 7-3-8 sx/sp

Similar Threads

  1. Long - the quotes of lovable larrikin, Nobel physicist Richard Feynman
    By InsatiableCuriosity in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-02-2010, 11:18 PM
  2. Richard Feynman
    By BlueScreen in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-05-2010, 07:38 PM
  3. [NT] Someone explain quantum physics (or theortical physics) to me
    By yenom in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-18-2010, 06:31 AM
  4. [NT] Any other NTs have a Genius-Crush on Richard Feynman?
    By Usehername in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-14-2007, 02:16 PM
  5. [NT] Richard Feynman: Ideal NT?
    By Usehername in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-09-2007, 11:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts