• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation

Athenian200

Protocol Droid
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
8,828
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4w5
I actually assumed levitation was already possible by facing two magnets with the same poles towards one another, but with sufficient weight to keep them from drifting apart completely. If I'm not mistaken, isn't that how some subway/rail systems work? (Particularly one called Maglev?) So how is this better? Wouldn't the levitation achieved from focusing a lens be more limited in application?
 

Langrenus

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
358
Did you read the article? A maglev-type system would be utterly useless in the kind of applications that are discussed.

Anyway, firstly this approach doesn't depend on the use of massive amounts of electricity (ala maglev systems) to maintain the levitation effect. Second, you wouldn't be confined to levitating materials with electromagnetic properties. Third, this can be applied on a much, much, much smaller scale.

There are 3 very quick and dirty reasons why this is better.
 
Top