User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

  1. #1
    Junior Member Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    MBTI
    pkjg
    Posts
    11

    Default Physicists have 'solved' mystery of levitation

    There is no pain so great as the memory of joy in present grief.

  2. #2
    Protocol Droid Athenian200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    8,828

    Default

    I actually assumed levitation was already possible by facing two magnets with the same poles towards one another, but with sufficient weight to keep them from drifting apart completely. If I'm not mistaken, isn't that how some subway/rail systems work? (Particularly one called Maglev?) So how is this better? Wouldn't the levitation achieved from focusing a lens be more limited in application?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Langrenus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    358

    Default

    Did you read the article? A maglev-type system would be utterly useless in the kind of applications that are discussed.

    Anyway, firstly this approach doesn't depend on the use of massive amounts of electricity (ala maglev systems) to maintain the levitation effect. Second, you wouldn't be confined to levitating materials with electromagnetic properties. Third, this can be applied on a much, much, much smaller scale.

    There are 3 very quick and dirty reasons why this is better.
    January has April's showers
    And 2 and 2 always makes a 5

  4. #4

    Default

    Not sure of implications yet.

    But, here is some additional information:

    Perfect lens could reverse Casimir force - Physics World - physicsworld.com

    "Normal" Casimir effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Dreaming up plans for first human levitation device.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

Similar Threads

  1. Why can’t the world’s greatest minds solve the mystery of consciousness?
    By Olm the Water King in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-11-2016, 06:19 AM
  2. I have a moment of love. Wish of love.
    By UnitOfPopulation in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-09-2009, 10:25 PM
  3. [ISTP] ISTPs - How Does One Have Those Kind of Conversations With You?
    By violaine in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-22-2009, 01:04 PM
  4. Mystery of Type.
    By phobosdiemos in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 11:24 AM
  5. Does everything we do have a hint of selfishness at its root?
    By swordpath in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 04:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO