|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Type: ISTJ
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 172
![]() |
While I was reading your responses to my questions about Seinfeld, Becker, and House's types, I got to thinking... Is it possible to make a fictional character that either doesn't have a type or can easily change type as the author pleases? Do you know of any fictional characters that defy being typed like this?
__________________
By the way, I'm the girl in the picture, lol.... happily married though, so don't even... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wait, what?
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INTP
Location: Sleep Deprivation
Posts: 1,736
![]() |
I'd think that an idealized character would defy typing, through showing the strong points of various types, without the weak points. A stereotype might also be difficult.
A flawed character might be easier to type, and I'd think that most of such could be assigned a rough type. I just realized my Oblivion char is probably ISTJ. Carry on.
__________________
We are not poets
We have no right to make amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
The Doctor is IN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INtP
Location: Free at last.
Posts: 14,307
![]() |
It depends on the type of story. Comedies in particular often use characters to fulfill roles rather than having personalities. The same goes with some allegories and mythical stories.
On the other extreme, sometimes a character can be so fully realized or mature that it's well-rounded and capable of different function usage, making it difficult to see what type it started out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2007
Type: INTx
Location: Champaign, Ill
Posts: 1,378
![]() |
Even real people often aren't easy to squeeze into a type, but people do it any, so the same can be made to work with fictional characters. fictional characters are often based off archetypes and such, but those can be fitted into types if someone really wants to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Pwning Life Since 1986
Join Date: May 2007
Type: INTJ
Location: XC ski and fort-building heaven
Posts: 1,975
![]() |
not to mention that tv shows have multiple writers that rotate, and thus would all add their own personal spins on how the characters would behave = blending/overlap of types depending ont he writers.
__________________
*You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body. *Faith is the art of holding on to things your reason once accepted, despite your changing moods. C.S. Lewis |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
My termites win
Join Date: Aug 2007
Type: intp
Location: North of somewhere (so not the south pole)
Posts: 3,203
![]() |
In a strange way, I think good fictional characters are more "typed" than real people are.
My theory (all-out, blind guess) is that when writers try to create a realistic person, what they end up with, is a symbolic version of a person (perhaps a Jungian archetype?). Also, I believe, it are these very "symbolic people" (the "persona's" of famous individuals and the "symbolized" versions of people known to those who created type theory) who form the basis for type theory. I hope you can parse that. If not I can rephrase.
__________________
sloan+ Rxua|I|; primary Inquisitive; R(82%)L(52%)U(62%)A(54%)I(86%) CTO of IPTN (see Maverick's Sig.) and member of Maverick's Biker Club. Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future. My Blog I linked some of your blogs; if you feel that is inappropriate, please let me know. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fictional SPs/SJs | Uberfuhrer | The SJ Guardhouse | 36 | 05-07-2009 03:57 PM |
| Type the Star Trek Characters | Dark Razor | Popular Culture and Type | 33 | 04-03-2009 05:20 PM |
| Typing Seinfeld Characters | RansomedbyFire | Popular Culture and Type | 22 | 01-04-2009 04:30 AM |
| Fictional NTs | Uberfuhrer | The NT Rationale | 221 | 10-12-2008 05:13 AM |
| Making characters fit | ygolo | MBTI (tm), Enneagram, and other personality matrices | 4 | 09-21-2007 01:40 PM |