View Poll Results: Arendt's type?
- 5. You may not vote on this poll
Hannah Arendt: NF but which NF?
* What will happen once the authentic mass man takes over, we do not know yet, although it may be a fair guess that he will have more in common with the meticulous, calculated correctness of Himmler than with the hysterical fanaticism of Hitler, will more resemble the stubborn dullness of Molotov than the sensual vindictive cruelty of Stalin.
o The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), part 3, chapter 10, section 2
* The concentration camps, by making death itself anonymous (making it impossible to find out whether a prisoner is dead or alive), robbed death of its meaning as the end of a fulfilled life. In a sense they took away the individual’s own death, proving that henceforth nothing belonged to him and he belonged to no one. His death merely set a seal on the fact that he had never existed.
o The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), part 3, chapter 12, section 3
* Man cannot be free if he does not know that he is subject to necessity, because his freedom is always won in his never wholly successful attempts to liberate himself from necessity.
o The Human Condition (1958), part 3, chapter 16
* . . . it is, in fact, far easier to act under conditions of tyranny than it is to think.
o The Human Condition (1958)
* In politics, love is a stranger, and when it intrudes upon it nothing is being achieved except hypocrisy. All the characteristics you stress in the Negro people: their beauty, their capacity for joy, their warmth, and their humanity, are well-known characteristics of all oppressed people. They grow out of suffering and they are the proudest possession of all pariahs. Unfortunately, they have never survived the hour of liberation by even five minutes. Hatred and love belong together, and they are both destructive; you can afford them only in private and, as a people, only so long as you are not free.
o Letter to James Baldwin, 21 November 1962
* What makes it so plausible to assume that hypocrisy is the vice of vices is that integrity can indeed exist under the cover of all other vices except this one. Only crime and the criminal, it is true, confront us with the perplexity of radical evil; but only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core.
o On Revolution (1963), ch. 2
* Political questions are far too serious to be left to the politicians.
o Men in Dark Times (1968)
* The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.
o The New Yorker, 12 September 1970
* The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.
o The Life of the Mind (1978): "Thinking"
* I've begun so late, really only in recent years, to truly love the world... Out of gratitude, I want to call my book [The Human Condition] on political theories Amor Mundi.
o Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth (2004) Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, p. xxiv
* The cultural treasures of the past, believed to be dead, are being made to speak, in the course of which it turns out that they propose things altogether different than what had been thought.
o "Martin Heidegger at Eighty," in Michael Murray ed., Heidegger and Modern Philosophy: Critical Essays (New Haven: Yale, 1978), pp. 294-295
 Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963)
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1963)
* What stuck in the minds of these men who had become murderers was simply the notion of being involved in something historic, grandiose, unique ("a great task that occurs once in two thousand years"), which must therefore be difficult to bear. This was important, because the murderers were not sadists or killers by nature; on the contrary, a systematic effort was made to weed out all those who derived physical pleasure from what they did. The troops of the Einsatzgruppen had been drafted from the Armed S.S., a military unit with hardly more crimes in its record than any ordinary unit of the German Army, and their commanders had been chosen by Heydrich from the S.S. élite with academic degrees. Hence the problem was how to overcome not so much their conscience as the animal pity by which all normal men are affected in the presence of physical suffering. The trick used by Himmler — who apparently was rather strongly afflicted by these instinctive reactions himself — was very simple and probably very effective; it consisted in turning these instincts around, as it were, in directing them toward the self. So that instead of saying: What horrible things I did to people!, the murderers would be able to say: What horrible things I had to watch in the pursuance of my duties, how heavily the task weighed upon my shoulders!
o Ch. VI
* The case of the conscience of Eichmann, which is admittedly complicated but is by no means unique, is scarcely comparable to the case of the German generals, one of whom, when asked at Nuremberg, "How was it possible that all of you honorable generals could continue to serve a murderer with such unquestioning loyalty?," replied that it was "not the task of a soldier to act as judge over his supreme commander. Let history do that or God in Heaven."
o Ch. VIII
* Eichmann, much less intelligent and without any education to speak of, at least dimly realized that it was not an order but a law which had turned them all into criminals. The distinction between an order and the Führer's word was that the latter's validity was not limited in time and space, which is the outstanding characteristic of the former. This is also the true reason why the Führer's order for the Final Solution was followed by a huge shower of regulations and directives, all drafted by expert lawyers and legal advisors, not by mere administrators; this order, in contrast to ordinary orders, was treated as a law. Needless to add, the resulting legal paraphernalia, far from being a mere symptom of German pedantry and thoroughness, served most effectively to give the whole business its outward appearance of legality.
And just as the law in civilized countries assumes that the voice of conscience tells everybody, "Thou shalt not kill," even though man's natural desires and inclinations may at times be murderous, so the law of Hitler's land demanded that the voice of conscience tell everybody: "Thou shalt kill," although the organizers of the massacres knew full well that murder is against the normal desires and inclinations of most people. Evil in the Third Reich had lost the quality by which most people recognize it — the quality of temptation.
o Ch. VIII
* The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together, for it implied — as had been said at Nuremberg over and over again by the defendants and their counsels — that this new type of criminal, who is in actual fact hostis generis humani, commits his crimes under circumstances that make it well-nigh impossible for him to know or to feel that he is doing wrong.
* No punishment has ever possessed enough power of deterrence to prevent the commission of crimes. On the contrary, whatever the punishment, once a specific crime has appeared for the first time, its reappearance is more likely than its initial emergence could ever have been.
 Crises of the Republic (1969)
* The chief reason warfare is still with us is neither a secret death-wish of the human species, nor an irrepressible instinct of aggression, nor, finally and more plausibly, the serious economic and social dangers inherent in disarmament, but the simple fact that no substitute for this final arbiter in international affairs has yet appeared on the political scene.
o "On Violence"
* The point, as Marx saw it, is that dreams never come true.
o "On Violence"
* Power and violence are opposites; where the one rules absolutely, the other is absent. Violence appears where power is in jeopardy, but left to its own course it ends in power's disappearance.
o "On Violence"
* The defiance of established authority, religious and secular, social and political, as a world-wide phenomenon may well one day be accounted the outstanding event of the last decade.
o "Civil Disobedience"
* Man's urge for change and his need for stability have always balanced and checked each other, and our current vocabulary, which distinguishes between two factions, the progressives and the conservatives, indicates a state of affairs in which this balance has been thrown out of order. No civilization — the man-made artifact to house successive generations — would ever have been possible without a framework of stability, to provide the wherein for the flux of change. Foremost among the stabilizing factors, more enduring than customs, manners and traditions, are the legal systems that regulate our life in the world and our daily affairs with each other.
o "Civil Disobedience"
* For the trouble with lying and decieving is that their efficiency depends entirely upon a clear notion of the truth that the liar and deceiver wishes to hide. In this sense, truth, even if it does not prevail in public, possesses an ineradicable primacy over all falsehoods.
o "Lying in Politics"
Originally Posted by Blackwater
It may be that the easiest way to type an intellectual is to look for his or her blunders. This is a deeply stupid remark -- hypocrites are worse than criminals? But it stems from her Fi-based love of authenticity and her incomprehension of Fe.
it would be wild if she was ENFP
Hah, I see that Nero is still on the ISFP list. Which is funny next to Jackie O and Jimmy Carter. Thank goodness Jimmy didn't stay in power for long. We all know what he was up to.
You are very welcome to suggest alternate typings
Though Nero, I think, is misunderstood. After his death, the senate voted to strike over his records (acta) and denounce him as a malevolent tyrant. Of course, he was capricious and prone to fits of rage when things didn't go his way. But a tyrant he was most likely not. In later years, scholars have tried to reconstruct his acta, looking beyond the posthumous state propaganda, and the image that emerges is of an aesthete that primarily cared for poetry, acting, interior decorating and such. He was almost burdened with the yoke of government and administration, and when things didn't go his way, he reacted by ordering the death (suicide) of those responsible.
In fact, Gibbon, the great historian, never believed the state propaganda. Thus he said of Nero: "Gibbon: "[Nero] excelled ... in the elegant arts of music and poetry we should not despise his persuits, had he not converted the pleasing relaxation ... into the [prime] ambition of his life."
Hope this clears up our typing
By proteanmix in forum Popular Culture and Type
Last Post: 07-02-2012, 07:28 AM
By Blackwater in forum Popular Culture and Type
Last Post: 11-27-2009, 02:19 PM
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO