My group's superiority is not my superiority. My superiority is established and independent of it. I'm just trying to ground in a fact that is truthful but everyone denies because it's offensive, which drives me up the wall. The truth is the truth, even if it's ugly.
My group's superiority is not my superiority. My superiority is established and independent of it. I'm just trying to ground in a fact that is truthful but everyone denies because it's offensive, which drives me up the wall.
Seriously, doesn't it bug you when people think being offensive somehow deprives you of the ability to be right? :steam:
If you could be anything you want, I bet you'd be disappointed--am I right?
The thing with all this information and research is what can you trust and what is dubious, if there's an equal amount of evidence for and against a theory or idea, it can be very hard to judge good research from bad research. The research of MBTI types correlating with IQ does seem a little dubious to me. Is there any other independent research in this area?
In a way, MBTI is just a catergorization system, you could easily divide people in 8, 35, or 127 different personality types.
To me it works good as a theoretical model but none of these types actually "exist", they are ideal archetypes.
first off, you're not getting the definitions of Se and Si quite correctly- especially since you're lumping them all into one clump- Se can be quite creative and work with knowlege from everywhere- it's just tuned in more to the present than Ne is... which often manifests itself as being more concrete and down to earth since it can more easily be applied to the world around us, while Si stores data and compares, networks and contrasts with it in the back of the mind- a lot of sciences and predictions are actually based on Se and Si like principles of observation and comparison of past results
Se's the one which reminds me to enjoy the real party at the moment it's there. Ne's the one which imagines a million alternative parties.
But what's happened to the original discussion in this thread, actually? The stupid guy in comic fiction, remember?
I've thought about the very few funny things I've read and enjoyed... and I remembered a lot of stupid ENTPs.
Face it. Stupid ENTPs can beat stupid ESFPs for comic action. Inventing all sorts of original solutions which never work properly, talking their heads off about their latest theory.
Got questions? Ask an ENTP!
I'm female. I just can't draw women