User Tag List

First 7891011 Last

Results 81 to 90 of 134

  1. #81
    Protocol Droid Athenian200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    8,828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    because of what is implied underneath. i don't need to tell you more than that.
    That all the people who've tried to type him so far are so stupid that they've never considered anything that violated an assumption that they mistakenly attributed to him?

    Don't worry, I think it's well known that people tend to do that. Everyone does it sometimes.

  2. #82
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athenian200 View Post
    That all the people who've tried to type him so far are so stupid that they've never considered anything that violated an assumption that they mistakenly attributed to him?

    Don't worry, I think it's well known that people tend to do that. Everyone does it sometimes.
    what are you talking about? this has nothing to do with typing, it has something to do with how to present data.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  3. #83
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    because of what is implied underneath. i don't need to tell you more than that.
    Just because I don't like you, doesn't mean you have to create a paranoid, conspiracy theory.

  4. #84
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    Just because I don't like you, doesn't mean you have to create a paranoid, conspiracy theory.
    your ego must be bigger than i thought if you think i care whether you like me or not.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  5. #85
    Protocol Droid Athenian200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    8,828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    your ego must be bigger than i thought if you think i care whether you like me or not.
    Ironically, your ego must be pretty big if you're arrogant enough not to care what they think of you.

    Interesting case of projection.

    (Sorry, I just couldn't resist pointing that out.)

  6. #86
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athenian200 View Post
    Ironically, your ego must be pretty big if you're arrogant enough not to care what they think of you.

    Interesting case of projection.
    in contrast to jaguar, i never tried to hide my ego.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  7. #87
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,412

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athenian200 View Post

    Well, I haven't heard about Singer and Loomis. What do you call a function order that isn't typical? What would you use for notation?
    MBTI Atypical. Lol.
    Frankly, I'd bet money a lot of people are "atypical."
    If you think he's Ni-Ti or Ti-Ni, that clearly implies Dom/Aux.

    As to Singer and Loomis, they are two women who decided to test MBTI.
    In a nutshell, the MBTI "assigned" function orders did not hold up.
    No shocker there.

    I'm talking out loud here, but, is there a way we could create a files and links section on this forum?
    Our own "library," so to speak.
    Thoughts, anyone?

  8. #88
    Protocol Droid Athenian200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Posts
    8,828

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    MBTI Atypical. Lol.
    Frankly, I'd bet money a lot of people are "atypical."
    If you think he's Ni-Ti or Ti-Ni, that clearly implies Dom/Aux.

    As to Singer and Loomis, they are two women who decided to test MBTI.
    In a nutshell, the MBTI "assigned" function orders did not hold up.
    No shocker there.

    I'm talking out loud here, but, is there a way we could create a files and links section on this forum?
    Our own "library," so to speak.
    Thoughts, anyone?
    I went to look some of this up, but all the data on it is proprietary and expensive. The research and testing methodology they came up with looked sound, though. Addresses a few things I always thought were wrong with MBTI.

    I have a feeling people still play with MBTI mostly because the material is freely accessible (as are the tests) for the most part. Better systems have probably been made (even from the same source), but they all cost money and can't be discussed or theorized about quite as openly.

  9. #89
    Senior Member the state i am in's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    MBTI
    infj
    Enneagram
    5w4 sx/sp
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    read lenore thomson if you want to understand a good middle ground between jungian functions and the myers briggs code. it clarifies the purpose j/p add to jungian cognitive functions and prescribes a pattern of development/activation that occurs when a dominant function develops an auxilary function to balance it in terms of i/e and perceiving/judging (ie rational).

    in other words, the functional development present in myers briggs is prescribed the way it is for a very good reason. that there are many variations and differences in articulation of expression seems like an irrelevant objection to me. i've identified w/ Ni and Ti more than any other functions for the majority of my life. understanding myers briggs and its articulation of the ramifications of such a lifestyle makes so much sense to me now. with all that said, the 4 letter code that best corresponds with mbti (which is AFTER jung's initial work) is infj. he's so much more Ni than Ne. he's way more Fe than Te. he's infj.

    also, i've heard both lenore thomson and katherine briggs are infjs. tho i could see lenore thomson (solely based on the book) being an intj too.

  10. #90
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    ESTJ
    Posts
    472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    have proof?
    1) Try to guess, based on my first message.
    2) There's no seriously proved method of proving (~100% accuracy) for type. There is no even method with seriously proved high accuracy (> 80% for ex) of type identifing.

Similar Threads

  1. Update on Jung’s Type
    By Article Poster in forum Typology Videos and RSS Feeds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-10-2015, 08:40 PM
  2. Jung Test - Type Evaluator
    By highlander in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-09-2014, 02:05 AM
  3. 5-Choice Jung P-Type Test
    By Jaguar in forum Online Personality Tests
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 09-12-2009, 07:53 AM
  4. Freud and Jung
    By Mole in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 03:33 AM
  5. Freud's type
    By Gabe in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-03-2008, 10:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO