User Tag List

First 89101112 Last

Results 91 to 100 of 134

  1. #91
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athenian200 View Post
    I went to look some of this up, but all the data on it is proprietary and expensive. The research and testing methodology they came up with looked sound, though. Addresses a few things I always thought were wrong with MBTI.
    You have to dig deeper for the good stuff.
    And it's free.
    The page to the .pdfs is not found,
    so here are links to the html versions:

    SINGER-LOOMIS TDI: THE NEXT GENERATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TYPE INSTRUMENT S. Dugan Haskayne School of Business


    Understanding Personality Functioning Without Forced Choice:


    I have a feeling people still play with MBTI mostly because the material is freely accessible (as are the tests) for the most part. Better systems have probably been made (even from the same source), but they all cost money and can't be discussed or theorized about quite as openly.

    Agreed.

  2. #92
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    why do people keep thinking that i don't know my type? i know my type, and it's ENXP. my auxiliary functions do not fit in neither ENTP or ENFP roles, but my dominant function is still Ne, and i use it extensively;

    i mean, how hard can it be to understand that not everyone fits the mere 16 types that MBTI offers?
    What kind of remarks are you making here, knowing full well you whined
    about my not lisiting a type for myself?

    And now here you are, suggesting not all people fall into an MBTI type?
    Well, no shit. How could someone NOT know this?

  3. #93
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    What kind of remarks are you making here, knowing full well you whined
    about my not lisiting a type for myself?
    i didn't whine about you not typing yourself. i "whined" about the way you behave. your complete refusal to use MBTI for any reason or consider it even a partial truth coupled with your general attitude and behavior would fit you into the "pretentious" box.

    you can prove me wrong by being less gutless and admitting that while MBTI types have faults, the theory behind it (and especially function theory) can still be used.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  4. #94
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,426

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sentura View Post
    i didn't whine about you not typing yourself. i "whined" about the way you behave. your complete refusal to use MBTI for any reason or consider it even a partial truth coupled with your general attitude and behavior would fit you into the "pretentious" box.

    you can prove me wrong by being less gutless and admitting that while MBTI types have faults, the theory behind it (and especially function theory) can still be used.
    The theory behind MBTI claims a specific PREDETERMINED function order.
    It's that simple.
    If you are gullible enough to believe it. Use it.

    I do find this MBTI blurb humorous:

    Don't like being put into one of 16 boxes?
    How about 1,000,000? With the MBTI® Step II report,
    there are that many combinations.


    That came out after people started claiming MBTI was bullshit.
    You think they are going to throw away all that money?
    They don't care about validity.
    Come on, don't be so naive.

  5. #95
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    like i said, i don't care about the 16 types. i care about its functions, not the function orders. fuck it, look at my type. do i fit into one of the 16 types? look at my function order. jesus.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  6. #96
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,426

    Default

    Well then WTF are you bitching about?
    I don't give a shit about the 16 types,
    or those fake MBTI function orders either.
    I do use the Jungian functions.
    How can you not GET THAT?
    *ucking ay already!

    No wonder Synarch said you need your ass pounded.
    He's right.

  7. #97
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    Well then WTF are you bitching about?
    I don't give a shit about the 16 types,
    or those fake MBTI function orders either.
    I do use the Jungian functions.
    How can you not GET THAT?
    *ucking ay already!
    what's your problem with stating your own function order then? i just don't get it, don't you want other people to know it?
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

  8. #98
    Wannabe genius Splittet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Posts
    632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jennifer View Post
    Yes, I thought Freud was an S. He's quite the empiricist.


    The empirical evidence is so lacking for psychoanalysis, I laugh when I read about it... It's not science, it's pseudoscience.
    "Neither a lofty degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together go to the making of genius. Love, love, love, that is the soul of genius." - Wolfgang Amadé Mozart

  9. #99
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,426

    Default

    Sentura--

    You care more about my specific function order,
    than Jungian functions as a whole.

    I don't care about yours;
    I care about the knowledge.

    That makes us opposites.

    I've stated elsewhere on this board what I've scored as.
    I've even talked about some of my preferred functions.
    It's no secret.
    You just think it is.

  10. #100
    Phoenix Incarnate Sentura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    MBTI
    ENXP
    Enneagram
    1w9
    Socionics
    ENTp
    Posts
    750

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    I've stated elsewhere on this board what I've scored as.
    I've even talked about some of my preferred functions.
    It's no secret.
    then i have no quarrel with you.
    i hunt INXPs for bounty
    FUNCTION ORDER FOR THOSE THAT CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT ENXP MEANS: Ne > Ni > Fi=Ti > *

    ...people tell me i have wildfires in my eyes

Similar Threads

  1. Update on Jung’s Type
    By Article Poster in forum Typology Videos and RSS Feeds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-10-2015, 08:40 PM
  2. Jung Test - Type Evaluator
    By highlander in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-09-2014, 02:05 AM
  3. 5-Choice Jung P-Type Test
    By Jaguar in forum Online Personality Tests
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 09-12-2009, 07:53 AM
  4. Freud and Jung
    By Mole in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 03:33 AM
  5. Freud's type
    By Gabe in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-03-2008, 10:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO