Go Back   Typology Central > The Channels > Politics, History, and Current Events

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2009, 10:00 AM   #21 (permalink)
^ He pronks, too!
 
Magic Poriferan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Type: INTP
Location: In your closet, or under your bed, waiting for the night-light to burn out.
Posts: 6,290
Magic Poriferan is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by murkrow View Post
Justify(lol) this statement, please.
Last time I checked, I'm not Synarch (though that was two days ago, and things might have changed) but allow me to hazard a response.

It is very hard to maintain social order without some concept of justice. Justice is bound to norms, and norms are enforced through what we call justice. It is a maintainer of norms, particularly in terms of dealing with what we consider violations of vital norms, i.e. mores. In other words, our norms outline how justice is to be served, and what is just, and then the service of justice keeps people in line with those norms.

If there were no norms, it would be a state of chaos that no society could exist in. Even selfish totalitarians want their people to have a sense of justice (the skilled ones will define justice themselves as much as possible). It's much easier to manage than a group of people with no values.
__________________
Go to sleep, iguana.


_________________________________
INTP. Type 1>6>5. I-P-S. Explained in detail here.

Also see my big ol' bowl of Enneagram.

And this is another one of my babies:
THE COMPLETE TYPE GROUPING ANALYSIS: By The Sponge.

For Christ's sake, read this book!
Magic Poriferan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 03:16 PM   #22 (permalink)
Preemptive Strike
 
Take Five's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Type: ISTJ
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 743
Take Five is unique just like everyone else
Default

Morality does and should play into politics. In democracies, the government has the responsibility to provide security and protection to citizens, and since the citizens choose their officials, people have a moral obligation to choose leaders to this end, should they choose to involve themselves.
__________________
Johari Nohari

"If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared. "--Niccolo Machiavelli
Take Five is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 09:45 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master of Reality
 
abra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Type: ENTJ
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,429
abra is unique just like everyone else
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magic Poriferan View Post
Last time I checked, I'm not Synarch (though that was two days ago, and things might have changed) but allow me to hazard a response.

It is very hard to maintain social order without some concept of justice. Justice is bound to norms, and norms are enforced through what we call justice. It is a maintainer of norms, particularly in terms of dealing with what we consider violations of vital norms, i.e. mores. In other words, our norms outline how justice is to be served, and what is just, and then the service of justice keeps people in line with those norms.

If there were no norms, it would be a state of chaos that no society could exist in. Even selfish totalitarians want their people to have a sense of justice (the skilled ones will define justice themselves as much as possible). It's much easier to manage than a group of people with no values.
The norms exist independent of justice, correct?

Could justice theoretically exist independent of politics?
I think so.

A definition of politics is necessary at this point.

I am referring specifically to the political structure of a state when I mention politics, but all the systems that connect human beings could be called political.

Can someone provide a working definition?
__________________
Mystic Tater: I think you're like a lazy Abra who sits there and lets his environment pile up into a junk yard, and then he teleports out of it.
abra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 10:39 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Valuable_Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Type: ENTP
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
Posts: 627
Valuable_Money is unique just like everyone else
Default

Here is my view of the two spectrums of polotics.

The right wing "Vote for us and that makes you a good person, much better than those lefties."

The left wing "vote for us and that makes you a smart person, much smarter than those righties."


Its the same mindless sheep that follow each party, the only difference is what apeals to them. So the real question is, Would you rather have everyone think you were a moraly upright person or everyone think your soooo smart.

This is just a generalization(of course both sides like to also say that they are smart/moral), of course, but its just a little somthing I noticed.



Also if you listen to news reports replace expert with high preist for some hilarious results.

"We have with us today, Samual Ruth, an expert in agriculture."

"We have with us today, Samual Ruth, high priest of agriculture."


Also Its my opinion that the republicans lost because they decided to take their social agenda down with them on the sinking ship that was their outdated economic policies. Im more of a moderateIndecisive loser so I dont really agree with there social policies but I also dont agree with Democratic ones either, and the fact that people are suggesting that they should dump their social policies but keep their economic ones send this message to me "I dont care what they do with our money but the fact that they disagree with me on <subject of moral/social debate> really bugs me, I mean the fact that they lost the election proves that they are wrong and that I am right!"

Its very strange how now that Democrats are in power theyve adopted alot of the high and mighty attitudes that killed the republicans. I almost busted out laughing when a woman called in to CNN C-Span(one of those news channels thats up in the 200s) and said that she thought people should obey our commander in chief(Obama)

So in conclusion both parties are full of idiots and were all fucked until a decent third party comes into power(lol never)

</mithanthropic rant>
__________________
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Valuable_Money is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Morality an Open and Closed Matter? coberst Philosophy and Spirituality 4 04-22-2009 10:30 PM
What is the Association of Efficiency with Morality? coberst Philosophy and Spirituality 1 04-02-2009 02:54 PM
Morality animenagai Philosophy and Spirituality 16 10-02-2008 03:59 PM
Title of this sector. SolitaryWalker Politics, History, and Current Events 13 05-04-2007 10:40 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0