National News - Judge bans Mongols from wearing trademark logo
So the judge ruled that any Mongols or affiliates found wearing the patch can have it seized, even if they aren't being indicted. This also includes bikes with the logo painted on it, etc. I could see the justification for revoking a trademark (maybe), but I'm not sure about rampant seizures based on essentially nothing in the case of Mongols & others who aren't actually accused of committing a crime and they haven't been found guilty under RICO. Is an accusation of the organization being a "corrupt organization" enough to warrant it?