User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: NOM is no longer 'nomnom'able?

  1. #1
    .~ *aĉa virino* ~. Array Totenkindly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    549 sx/sp
    LII Ni

    Default NOM is no longer 'nomnom'able?

    The National Organization for Marriage has collapsed into debt.

    On Wednesday, the viciously anti-gay National Organization for Marriage finally released its 2013 tax filings—two days late, in direct violation of federal law. The results are nothing short of brutal. NOM raised $5.1 million last year—a 50 percent drop-off from its 2012 earnings. Two donors accounted for more than half of that money. And the group’s “Education Fund,” which churns out anti-gay propaganda and homophobic calumny, raised less than $1.7 million, a 70 percent decline from 2012. NOM closed out the year more than $2.5 million in debt.

    How did this collapse occur so quickly? I have three theories.
    - The first is that casual donors grew weary of NOM’s execrably hateful campaigns and craven refusal to face public censure....
    - My second, related theory is NOM’s donors are increasingly terrified of being unmasked...
    - My third theory—and probably the most likely one—is that NOM’s former donor base has simply lost interest. The battle is over. They know it, and they’re moving on.
    it's a blog piece, and obviously the author has particular (and intense) feelings towards NOM.

    But just focusing on the facts themselves, the money losses... that's a HUGE decline in two years -- 50% dropoff in money raised (with half of what remains mostly supplied by two donors?), and the education fund is down 70% in money raised.

    IOW, they've been a very vocal very prominent voice in the debate for a long time, but it looks like that time might soon be over. It makes you wonder what things might sound like in a year or two.

    (Although, technically, one could say the question is no longer relevant to the voting base, where their efforts have been aimed towards, and instead appears to have been determined at this stage by the judicial system.)
    "Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"

    “Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft

  2. #2
    Emperor/Dictator Array kyuuei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008


    I like it when money is speaking the language of the people.
    Kantgirl: Just say "I'm feminine and I'll punch anyone who says otherwise!"
    Halla74: Think your way through the world. Feel your way through life.

    Cimarron: maybe Prpl will be your girl-bud
    prplchknz: i don't like it

    In Search Of... ... Kiwi Sketch Art ... Dream Journal ... Kyuuei's Cook book ... Kyu's Tiny House Blog ... Minimalist Challenge ... Kyu's Savings Challenge

Similar Threads

  1. [INTP] INTPs: If someone is no longer interesting, do you ignore them?
    By Anew Leaf in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-15-2012, 07:07 PM
  2. When is being late no longer fashionable?
    By Lurker in forum Welcomes and Introductions
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-17-2009, 10:33 PM
  3. 'The Bible is no longer considered part of the conversation'
    By Sniffles in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: 04-17-2009, 08:36 AM
  4. There is no such thing as personality.
    By ygolo in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-12-2009, 10:13 AM
  5. The Camel Spider Is No Joke
    By disregard in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-04-2007, 01:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts