User Tag List

First 7891011 Last

Results 81 to 90 of 119

  1. #81
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IndyAnnaJoan View Post
    Just found this:
    http://theredpillroom.blogspot.com/2...roduction.html

    That sounds absolutely awful...

  2. #82
    Senior Member IndyGhost's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    MBTI
    ISFP
    Enneagram
    4w5 sx/sp
    Socionics
    SEI
    Posts
    2,399

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
    That sounds absolutely awful...
    That article made my head hurt. I pretty much never want to socialize ever again.
    "I don't know a perfect person.
    I only know flawed people who are still worth loving."
    -John Green

  3. #83
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    It's official; I'm not female.
    I'd be willing to bet that you've been with an Alpha-...

    That, if you were to meet a true Alpha+ (let's say, a good-looking ENTJ 8w9) you would find him attractive...

    And, yes, I think you absolutely would find plenty of Gamma+s attractive.

  4. #84
    The High Priestess Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Enfp
    Enneagram
    497 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEE Fi
    Posts
    14,657

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
    I'd be willing to bet that you've been with an Alpha-...

    That, if you were to meet a true Alpha+ (let's say, a good-looking ENTJ 8w9) you would find him attractive...

    And, yes, I think you absolutely would find plenty of Gamma+s attractive.
    My first was an Alpha +, according to this. Never again. I don't play second violin - ever. So sure, they're attractive, for about half a minute and perhaps if I'm bored, playing their Game and letting them think they're getting somewhere can be amusing but that's about it.

    And sure, I like my gammas +, but the way they're described here, they can keep em. If I wanted to consistently ignored in favour for the shit in his head, I might go for it though.

    Ultimately, the shit I actually base my attraction on and the stuff that actually *seals* the deal and gets you into my bed is just not listed in this chart - sorry.
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★





    "Harm none, do as ye will”

  5. #85
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IndyAnnaJoan View Post
    That article made my head hurt. I pretty much never want to socialize ever again.
    Inorite?

    If it is relatively true, it also has some frightening implications for politics (and business)...

  6. #86
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    My first was an Alpha +, according to this. Never again. I don't play second violin - ever. So sure, they're attractive, for about half a minute and perhaps if I'm bored, playing their Game and letting them think they're getting somewhere can be amusing but that's about it.
    That might sound well and good, but, as you said yourself, you originally went with the Alpha.

    Ultimately, the shit I actually base my attraction on and the stuff that actually *seals* the deal and gets you into my bed is just not listed in this chart - sorry.
    I'm not saying what you're attracted to is explicitly stated in those descriptions.

    I'm just saying that members of various parts of this chart DO have the qualities you're attracted to.

    It's not like the chart was an exhaustive account of the individual qualities of every member of each of these groups.

  7. #87
    The High Priestess Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Enfp
    Enneagram
    497 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEE Fi
    Posts
    14,657

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
    That might sound well and good, but, as you said yourself, you originally went with the Alpha.



    I'm not saying what you're attracted to is there.

    I'm just saying that members of various parts of this chart DO have the qualities you are attracted to.
    Actually, I went originally for the alpha because he 'faked' the traits I *was* looking for and I was too inexperienced to see it. The rest was just a bonus, tbh - and sure, it did wow me at the time. It's true, I enjoy intelligence and confidence in a guy, but ultimately they aren't what seal the deal.

    If this is meant to be a chart gain access to sex with females, based on the traits that are most likely to make you succeed...at least in my books, it fails.
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★





    "Harm none, do as ye will”

  8. #88
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    Actually, I went originally for the alpha because he 'faked' the traits I *was* looking for and I was too inexperienced to see it. The rest was just a bonus, tbh - and sure, it did wow me at the time. It's true, I enjoy intelligence and confidence in a guy, but ultimately they aren't what seal the deal.

    If this is meant to be a chart gain access to sex with females, based on the traits that are most likely to make you succeed...at least in my books, it fails.
    I don't think that's what it's meant to be...

    I think it's just meant to be descriptive of a hierarchy amongst males that purportedly exists.

    And it's not meant to presume access to all females, nor ENFP females, nor the best females... just, the average female...

  9. #89
    The High Priestess Amargith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    MBTI
    Enfp
    Enneagram
    497 sx/so
    Socionics
    IEE Fi
    Posts
    14,657

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
    I don't think that's what it's meant to be...

    I think it's just meant to be descriptive of a hierarchy amongst males that purportedly exists.

    And it's not meant to presume access to all females, nor ENFP females, nor the best females... just, the average female...
    Oh, I agree with everything in this post, but your original post that I quoted stated it was based on the fundamentals. And it was to that post that I jokingly replied: I must not be female.
    ★ڿڰۣ✿ℒoѵℯ✿ڿڰۣ★





    "Harm none, do as ye will”

  10. #90
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amargith View Post
    Oh, I agree with everything in this post, but your original post that I quoted stated it was based on the fundamentals. And it was to that post that I jokingly replied: I must not be female.
    Well excuse my Te for not being precise enough

Similar Threads

  1. Temperaments (Social Styles)
    By sdalek in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-05-2009, 09:30 PM
  2. Rarest male type?
    By Economica in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 08-18-2007, 01:25 PM
  3. Relational Competition and "Social" Bullying
    By Maverick in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 08:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO