@DiscoBiscuit, meh, you caught me before the edit.
I assume you were referring to me in the last line. Ironically, I was, at the time you were writing and posting that, affirming that I do not at all feel like you are stupid for holding those positions.
But you respond to me like I have done something wrong. Again. Because I am a woman responding where women were not explicitly addressed.
Women are not to speak until spoken to?
Because the article is pejorative towards women and it's gracious of them to have expended any effort on it whatsoever.The majority of female responses to the article in the OP have not been positive. Why be more generous towards their arguments than they are towards mine?
But more seriously, because maybe they had good ideas worth discussing.
Maybe they didn't.
But the tone seems to be that they didn't have good ideas worth discussing because they were women.