I'm also a little amused, in that the thread is about the British using the technology, yet a number of responses are about the US having them, owning them or using the american "we". Noone has commented on the Brits, heh.
It is just because the latest story is about the British admitting to their use? So the news story is about the UK but most responders in this thread are from USA so that is where their focus is.
Funny isn't it, how blowing someone's head off with a bullet is fine, but blowing them up en masse with a bomb, isn't. Ethics are weird things.
Heh, this is what I was thinking too. War is hell no matter how you look at it. On the other hand certain weapons like poison gas were outlawed in the Geneva conventions. I wonder if the military would view thermobaric weapons in a similar light.
My wife and I made a game to teach kids about nutrition. Please try our game and vote for us to win. (Voting period: July 14 - August 14) http://www.revoltingvegetables.com
It's the controller of the weapon, not the weapon itself, that matters. The Taliban have received all manner of invitations to scatter and give up, very few questions asked, their ambitions for selective, eager and compulsive murder of defenseless people -- be it obliterating school-going little girls or the presumptively beardless.
Contrast that with the Briton bombardiers who'd rather be back home or at the very least, doing something someplace else. The weapon would sit in a warehouse sempiternally, never to be used unless someone with the mindset of the Taliban got hold of it.