What exactly is so baffling about 1 quote + 2nd contradictory quote + sarcastic invitation for you to demonstrate how they're not contradictory ?
Or maybe you realize your blatant contradictions and you're just trying to deflect me from finding more by accusing me of some ulterior motive?
And yeah, I do think that Lat's concept of economic freedom is truer than yours. That's because you can't even tell anyone what yours is or keep your simultaneously existing definitions story straight. If you can't decide whether your argument should be right on the basis of logic or linguistic relativism, then why should anyone else?