User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Implications and consequences of an atheist society

  1. #21
    .~ *aĉa virino* ~. Array Totenkindly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    549 sx/sp
    LII Ni


    Quote Originally Posted by Andy View Post
    So by liberal religion, I guess I mean one that was few central dictates about what is right and wrong or expected, with the individual being left to make up their own mind. Does that help?
    Yup. I mean, that was one possibility, but I wasn't sure if that was the angle you were coming from. Thanks.
    "Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"

    “Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft

  2. #22
    He pronks, too! Array Magic Poriferan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    One sx/sp


    Quote Originally Posted by fia View Post
    I wonder what percentage of atheists do use Dawkins and Singer as models of inspiration. I certainly do not. I have leanings in the direction of Buddhism as a philosophy which currently has more influence than the two highly vocal atheists you mention. Not all atheists are vocal, and there are plenty who people don't even realize are atheists. I'm not certain of your premise that social darwinism required Darwin as a precursor because Darwin is often misunderstood.
    Social Darwinism is actually a concept created by the sociologist Herbert Spencer. He did not call it that, however. A third party commentator called it that and both Herbert Spencer and Charles Darwin had, for their own reasons, rejected that term.

    I too grant little credit to Dawkins ot Singer for inspiring my ideas. I was raised an agnostic atheist in a rather open-ended and intellectual household, and learned about Richard Dawkins somewhere in my mid to late teens, and Singer a little bit later. Dawkins is right about a number of things but philosophically he didn't give me anything I didn't have. I also have some issues with his ideas on memes, and I think he is a little too dismissive of a person (like in regards to the possibility of group selection). Singer runs into some major moral roadblocks with me because he's a negative utilitarian who then tries to work around the inherent problems of such a philosophy with a bunch of arbitrations that strike me as all too deontological.

    That being said, Lark does seem to misunderstand Dawkins a bit. It has been said many times that a selfish gene does not amount to a selfish organism per se. Dawkins made an entire documentary titled Nice Guys Finish First about this very point.

    There's been a media blitz lately for certain atheist figures, but the exposure is really all they bring. There aren't any spiritual leaders for agnostics and atheists at large. I almost feel like those religious people who believe there are simply box atheism and agnosticism into their own way of doing things.
    Go to sleep, iguana.

    INTP. Type 1>6>5. sx/sp.
    Live and let live will just amount to might makes right

Similar Threads

  1. Is the truth of something as important as its implications?
    By Lark in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-29-2012, 02:42 AM
  2. Peak oil and all of it consequences
    By Virtual ghost in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 02-09-2011, 03:01 PM
  3. Implications of being almost balanced
    By Saslou in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-21-2010, 04:59 PM
  4. Punishment and Consequences
    By Lark in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 10:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts