User Tag List

First 10181920212230 Last

Results 191 to 200 of 485

  1. #191
    Senior Member Gish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    MBTI
    STUF
    Posts
    891

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Orangey View Post
    Anyway, WTF does any of this shit you guys are talking about have to do with the video, which was about porno and video games (it is alleged) causing dudes to avoid interaction with the "real" world and relationships? This all started with whoever posted that stupid goddamn video of that woman blaming the problem on women and feminists. You're supposed to direct your ire at either porn/video games (apparently they're the same) or internet-will-be-the-downfall-of-mankind alarmists.
    Go burn your bra somewhere else, granola face. This is TypoC. We do what we want unless the moderation gets offended.
    Whoops.

  2. #192
    Blah Orangey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    ESTP
    Enneagram
    6w5
    Socionics
    SLE
    Posts
    6,364

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zarathustra View Post
    Wow.

    You sound very concerned about the welfare of men.

    I wonder how you'd feel about a man saying the same shit to women.
    Saying what? That we are deeply off topic? I wasn't aware that that was an offensive sentiment, but have fun with your self-righteous indignation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gish View Post
    Go burn your bra somewhere else, granola face. This is TypoC. We do what we want unless the moderation gets offended.
    You so stooopit, gurrrl.
    Artes, Scientia, Veritasiness

  3. #193
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    14,031

    Default


  4. #194
    Blah Orangey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    MBTI
    ESTP
    Enneagram
    6w5
    Socionics
    SLE
    Posts
    6,364

    Default

    I think the latter half of this thread counts as pure concern trolling.
    Artes, Scientia, Veritasiness

  5. #195
    Permabanned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    MBTI
    ISFP
    Enneagram
    6w7 sx
    Socionics
    SEE Fi
    Posts
    25,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gish View Post
    You two should brohug and get a broroom together.

    I'm a supporter of human rights, not mens or womens rights.

    There is a physical difference though and it would be stupid to ignore that, even the brain structure is different.

    I think people are uncomfortable with that fact.
    if there was a like button, I would click it

    somebody mark this day down for posterity

  6. #196
    Society
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marmie Dearest View Post
    So @Mane and @Zarathustra, Im sorry to hear that. Were you actually injured in the incidents or physically afraid of her? Im seriously asking.
    afraid of being hurt and demeaned? yes. afraid of physical injury? no. but from my limited anecdotal information (a female friend shared with me about a similar experience with her ex spouse while opening up to me, not knowing i experienced the same, a bit ironically, my ex-wife's aunt), its the first parts that tend to sting the most, so while i can't tell of first hand, until i see anything to make me think otherwise, i doubt there's much of difference in the experience, nor do i consider a women who does it to be of any less abusive (i do admit that i have taken it a step too far to fear that this or the mentality behind it is a hidden INFJ trait as shown in the thread i previously linked, but that's getting off topic).

  7. #197

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Orangey View Post
    I think the latter half of this thread counts as pure concern trolling.
    http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...=concern+troll

    As in someone pretending to be on one "side" while actually being on the other? (def. 1)
    If so, who, and how?

    Or is it more like what is in definition 4?
    In a situation where there exists mutually exclusive positions A and B, a concern troll is someone who supports A but professes to support B around genuine supporters of B. However, they express their "concerns" about aspects of position B in order to sow doubt and uncertainty amongst genuine supporters of B.

    Whilst this does genuinely happen, the term is used by some paranoid people to effectively mean "anyone who does not agree entirely with the standard dogma of position B, thus must actually covertly support position A", when said person does actually support B, just only 99%.

    Thus: disagreeing *at all* with the standard dogma of B will get you branded by such people as The Enemy, and you will get generally treated with hostility and suspicion and, at worst, forcibly ejected from the B-supporter group. Result: everyone stops thinking about the issues, and discussion descends into not arriving at logical and interesting places but who can most furiously support B.
    1: "All Democrats should be hanged, drawn and quartered! Grrgrrrgrrrgr!"
    2: "Uh.. that's a bit excessive. I mean, I don't agree with the Democrats, but maybe we shouldn't actually, like, KILL them.."
    1: "CONCERN TROLL! CLEARLY YOU ARE 100% DEMOCRAT! BEGONE, SINNER!"
    (everyone flings rotten fruit at 2 until he leaves
    EDIT: But I do agree, we are far away from the original topic. I thought this was typical of TypoC (at least since the days of Zergling the thread splitter).

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

  8. #198
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/so
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Orangey View Post
    Saying what? That we are deeply off topic? I wasn't aware that that was an offensive sentiment, but have fun with your self-righteous indignation.
    The thread is titled "The Demise of Guys".

    That is what every bit of the discussion that you called "shit" has been about.

    Your pro-woman moralism would have more efficacy if you actually cared about equality.

  9. #199
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,409

    Default

    This thread is like watching a bizarre variation of a food fight.

  10. #200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    This thread is like watching a bizarre variation of a food fight.
    I wanted to make a graph of who disagreed with who in this thread, then also a graph of who confused whose statements for someone else's.

    That would be quite interesting and amusing.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

Similar Threads

  1. The Demise of Ladies
    By Beorn in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 01-08-2013, 10:46 PM
  2. [INTP] How Can I Win the Love of an INTP Guy?
    By I Never Find Peace in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 05-04-2012, 02:08 PM
  3. The Demise of Zergling
    By Haight in forum Official Decrees
    Replies: 444
    Last Post: 10-25-2011, 07:04 PM
  4. What are you guys feeling about the state of affairs now?
    By Risen in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 03-31-2009, 02:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO