Well then please enlighten me, where in that post do you see the hallmarks of bias... things like ad hominem attacks?
To me, every criticism raised seems substantive.
What I assume is that you empathize with it, and as such see yourself as a supporter of the same.I said stay far away from the movement, and you assume i'm an activist... lol
I assumed you were more inclined to agree with the protesters than not.this branches off the previouse assumption, more emotionally toned
And then asked you what those protests have achieved.
If you didn't give a fuck you wouldn't have posted. If you support OWS, then support it. I'd be much more inclined to respect (but probably still disagree with) your view if you would take a stand as opposed to climbing back up on the fence.it was a statement with my perspective of what is going on, idgaf about the semantics of the situation
But to each their own.
No, I notice the similarities between the two, most specifically the great overlap in those likely to protest or agree with the protesters.you assimilate this separate movement with OWS, and emotionaly judge it in that sense, thus biased.
If I skipped some mental math, and assumed that those in both protests or those that agree with them are much more likely to be ideologically similar than they are different, then sue me.
That's not exactly a huge leap to make.
You only get one chance at life, you might as well swing at every pitch, even if you miss a few.
EDIT - sorry for taking so long to get back to you. I had a long day.