I took an online libertarian purity test and one of the questions I found intriguing was:
"Should private clubs have sole authority to select their own members, even if they are discriminatory? "
I guess I agree, but only to a point. I do believe that people are entitled to their opinions and in freedom of speech but I think some hate groups like the KKK do things that are truly reprehensible and should be outlawed.
I guess it depends on what actions the group takes and in what sense they are discriminatory.
If you have a hate group against a certain race, it's one thing if its just a group of individuals talking among themselves, not actually taking any political action or spreading hate outside the group vs. a group like the KKK. I may not approve of the former, but I wouldn't outlaw such a thing. Groups like the KKK, I would like to see outlawed.
There are lots of groups that are discriminatory that we may not think about as such because they discriminate on things other than race or gender. Take Mensa for example. If you can't score in the top 2% on a standardized IQ test, you can't get accepted. Yet, I'm perfectly okay with groups such as Mensa existing even though I have no interest in going such groups myself. I see the value of intellectually gifted people wanting to interact with people like themselves.
Fraternities and sororities are discriminating too. Some involve hazing and if you don't pass the hazing you don't get in. I don't approve of some of the hazing measures but I wouldn't outlaw them unless it physically harms them or leads to serious emotional damage.
There are groups for tall people, short people, redheads, and people named Bob. They are discriminatory in the literal sense but most people don't see such groups as threatning. They are more fun and frivolous than anything.
So what's your take on this issue?
03-08-2012, 07:01 PM #1
Should discriminatory groups be allowed to exist?INtp
5w6 or 9w1 sp/so/sx, I think
03-15-2012, 05:04 PM #2
The problem with people campaigning against hatred is its a human emotion, I dont think there should be a thought or feelings police, no matter how well intended and that while, of necessity, there isnt such a thing as complete freedom of action there should surely be much greater capacity for freedom of thought or feelings.
Objectively it is more of an issue for the hater than their object, I'm betting, nine times out of ten that they give more thought to the object of their hate than their object gives to them, in fact the same object's indifference could be part of the reason for the hatred or get it even more stoked.
I suppose it becomes a real problem when obsessing or fantasising turns into compulsive actions, like assaulting strangers or premeditated murder on a grand scale like that nazi psycho in Norway who went killing children to kill two generations of socialists. However I've got to say that I've seen demonstrations in the US in which armed groups of KKK or white supremacists rallied in the same place as armed black panthers and they didnt murder one another. In Northern Ireland I've seen people prepared to literally tear each other apart with their bare hands and its taken heavily armed police and soldiers to maintain a sembalence of public order. So there's hate and there's hate.
Also, there's a big thing about this topic which grates with me, people usually have their own favourite sorts of haters which they will target for discussion and not give much thought to others or often less obvious sorts of hatred, such as hatred of religion, religious or traditionalist people and their values and beliefs. In the UK for instance its alright to put them out of work or close their businesses if they are honest that they dont feel they can in good conscience provide the same service to homosexuals as heterosexuals.It is a luxury to be understood - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities - Voltaire
A kind thought is the hope of the world - Anon
03-17-2012, 02:50 PM #3garbageGuest
@Lark's first paragraph hits it home for me, and his general sentiment is spot on.
More generally, to me, it boils down to the role of free speech. Given that an idea is maligned, should it be allowed to be heard, lest it perpetuate and cause bad things to happen?
It seems that wrong-headed ideas have the power to motivate people to do bad, especially in the hands of motivational people--but that despite that risk, we ought to allow them to exist and to allow 'natural forces' (society, equally powerful put polar opposite ideas, etc.) to quash them.
03-17-2012, 09:54 PM #4
I agree with Lark and bologna in principle. We should not be legislating how people should or should not think or feel. I think most people will agree to that.
I think the other side's main point is that hatred of others is not good for society in the long term. I think most people will agree to that as well.
Frankly, I think there is a big difference between disliking hatred and bigotry and working to change people's hearts and minds, and legislating that people cannot hate. I think legislation of emotion is wrong, and probably ineffective too.
I guess the question is where you draw the line between thoughts and feelings, and preparation for acts of violence. If the KKK is meeting to plan to set fire to a Church, I believe it is clear they are conspiring to commit a crime. But what about people who say stuff like, "All socialists should be put in a room and burned alive"? (I had a friend in HS say exactly that). Should making that comment be a crime?
Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
"As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
"[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
"[P]etabytes of  data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield
03-17-2012, 10:49 PM #5
But what about people who say stuff like, "All socialists should be put in a room and burned alive"? (I had a friend in HS say exactly that). Should making that comment be a crime?
However, again, any rules directed at such things also would catch less deadly things in its net. It's very hard to enforce consistently and fairly."Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"
“Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft
03-17-2012, 11:00 PM #6
I don't know. As much as I *want* to bullshit you and say the "right" thing and put free speech on a pedestal, I think it'd be cool if the KKK didn't exist. Among others. I have some interesting experiences with them (not interesting enough though for me to consider them useful in any way).
03-18-2012, 12:42 AM #7
ENFP: We put the Fi in Fire
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- 5w4 sx/sp
- SLI None
Motivation: Dark Worker
Alignment: Chaotic Neutral
MTG Color: black/red
Male Archtype: King/Lover
"You are a gay version of Gambit" Speed Gavroche
"I wish that I could be affected by any hate, but I can't, cuz I just get affected by the bank" Chamillionaire
03-18-2012, 03:51 AM #8
The problem of freedom is that you cant control it. Cause when you start controlling it, its not freedom anymore.
03-18-2012, 05:51 AM #9FigerPuppetGuest
Legislating against certain kinds of thought and feelings is a very bad idea. Look at Germany: Neo-Nazi organizations, related and derivative symbols and Holocaust denial are all outlawed. Emotions start festering when people aren't allowed to have an outlet and feel oppressed by the state, and it can have a radicalizing effect on these people. I think this is why the far right of Germany is growing in numbers and why the number of cases of Neo-Nazi violence has risen.
03-18-2012, 08:33 AM #10
By Giggly in forum The SJ Guardhouse (ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ)Replies: 94Last Post: 05-21-2011, 11:20 AM
By wolfy in forum The BonfireReplies: 107Last Post: 11-08-2009, 02:03 AM
By Soar337 in forum The BonfireReplies: 123Last Post: 11-07-2009, 04:58 AM
By 527468 in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 51Last Post: 05-25-2009, 11:53 PM