User Tag List

First 1234 Last

Results 21 to 30 of 31

  1. #21
    Aquaria mrcockburn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    3w4 sp/so


    Only if I would've voted for him anyway. I don't see how it should be my concern. I'm not going to intern for any of them any time soon.
    3w4-9w1-?w6 (nearly headless nick)
    Lawful Evil



  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009


    2 factors to be considered,
    first, what is the condition of his condition..
    second, who did he pick for vice presidency..

  3. #23


    I suspect that an HIV+ presidential candidate, even if having otherwise stellar health and their condition was well under control with the help of anti-retrovirals, would not be electable at this time. I'm not sure when that would change either, but I suspect it will eventually... just speculation on my part, but I was wondering if any you agree/disagree and if you have any ideas as to why that is the case.
    "The purpose of life is to be defeated by greater and greater things." - Rainer Maria Rilke

  4. #24
    Minister of Propagandhi ajblaise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008


    The right person... HIV positively I would.

  5. #25
    Emperor/Dictator kyuuei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008


    Some of the best people in the history of ever were mental cases... In comparison, a president that got High-fived wouldn't really bother me.

    I think what would bother me is narcissistic (is that even the word?) personality disorder, and things of that nature.
    Kantgirl: Just say "I'm feminine and I'll punch anyone who says otherwise!"
    Halla74: Think your way through the world. Feel your way through life.

    Cimarron: maybe Prpl will be your girl-bud
    prplchknz: i don't like it

    In Search Of... ... Kiwi Sketch Art ... Dream Journal ... Kyuuei's Cook book ... Kyu's Tiny House Blog ... Minimalist Challenge ... Kyu's Savings Challenge

  6. #26
    Charting a course
    Join Date
    Jan 2009


    Would not have a problem as long as the condition was under control.

    However, I think there is still stigmata attached to it that would make it highly unlikely that he/she would be elected anytime in the near future.

  7. #27
    Honor Thy Inferior Such Irony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    5w6 sp/so
    LII Ne


    Quote Originally Posted by iwakar View Post
    Please share your reasons for why you would/wouldn't elect someone to presidential office in this light. Also, what medical conditions would be gamechangers for you as a voter?
    Quote Originally Posted by iwakar View Post
    It's irrelevant to public interest even if it's a mental or neurologically deleterious condition?
    HIV positive probably wouldn't affect my decision to vote for that candidate because HIV positive people can live many years after the diagnosis. Some HIV positive people never get full blown AIDS at all. Something else kills them first.

    What would make me hesitate to vote for a candidate would be a terminal illness with only a short time left to live, say a couple years or less, with very little chance of it being extended.

    Neurological issues may also prevent me from voting, if the condition seriously affects the ability to do the job effectively.
    5w6 or 9w1 sp/so/sx, I think
    Neutral Good

  8. #28
    Certified Sausage Smoker Elfboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    5w4 sx/sp
    SLI None


    Quote Originally Posted by AphroditeGoneAwry View Post
    I would hope that someone at the extreme upper levels of government would be voluntarily transparent, and I think the public encourages this. I personally would not discriminate based on a medical condition, if I liked the candidate. I would also hope that someone who has made it that far (as to be elected for pres) would be ethical in that if they felt like they had a condition that would conflict with being president, they would step down.
    I'm good with the current basic requirements for president.
    I don't want to sound mean or anything, but the idea of that happening in today's political system is blissfully naive.
    that being said, no, having HIV would not deter me from voting for a particular candidate.
    ENFP: We put the Fi in Fire
    5w4>1w9>2w1 Sx/Sp
    Papa Bear
    Motivation: Dark Worker
    Alignment: Chaotic Neutral
    Chibi Seme
    MTG Color: black/red
    Male Archtype: King/Lover
    "You are a gay version of Gambit" Speed Gavroche
    "I wish that I could be affected by any hate, but I can't, cuz I just get affected by the bank" Chamillionaire

  9. #29
    LL P. Stewie Beorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008


    Not a problem for me. It's not 1987.
    Take the weakest thing in you
    And then beat the bastards with it
    And always hold on when you get love
    So you can let go when you give it

  10. #30
    failure to thrive AphroditeGoneAwry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    451 sx/so
    ENFj Ni


    Quote Originally Posted by Elfboy View Post
    I don't want to sound mean or anything, but the idea of that happening in today's political system is blissfully naive.
    that being said, no, having HIV would not deter me from voting for a particular candidate.
    Candidates have traditionally made their IRS reports available, for example.

    On the one hand, you want a free capitalist society (i'm assuming here), but on the other, you want to micromanage the information and personal life of candidates at large? Excuse me, but those sound like fundamentally opposed ideologies. If you believe in a free market system and democracy, then you would also believe the masses would take care of electing who they thought best, and demand the information necessary from candidates to make the best decision to that end.

    I still don't see compelling evidence that transparency of candidates and officials' personal lives need be some sort of rule or requirement, beyond the simple ones already demanded for someone holding a position of higher power (like being a US citizen, etc).

    What would you proscribe for rules of disclosure for potential candidates?
    4w5 5w4 1w9
    ~Torah observant, Christ inspired~
    Life Path 11

    The more one loves God, the more it is that having nothing in the world means everything, and the less one loves God, the more it is that having everything in the world means nothing.

    Do not resist an evil person, but to him who strikes you on the one cheek, offer also the other. ~Matthew 5:39

Similar Threads

  1. If I candidate for a president of United States would you vote for me?
    By hacbad macbar in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-01-2014, 07:06 AM
  2. Would you vote to re-elect Barack Obama for president?
    By A window to the soul in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 11-20-2011, 11:48 PM
  3. Replies: 4246
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 01:17 PM
  4. How would you feel if your child one day dies for his/her country?
    By Virtual ghost in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 11-15-2008, 04:25 PM
  5. Do him, would you?
    By white in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 09:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO