so i am just curious... lots of democrats (and other people, but right now i'm talking about democrats and supporters of the current administration) lamented Bush's war in Iraq as illegal, unfounded and unnecessary while we were invading them. i'm not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone's stance, just stating an observation. i mean, they were very passionate about this.
also, a lot of democrats these days still very much support Obama. I live in chicago, and its definitely his territory here.
so how can such fervent supporters of president Obama (and lamenters of Bush) justify the U.S.'s current involvement in the Libyan war with a straight face?
seems a bit hypocritical to me. it seems to be just as shady or even more shady than the Iraqi invasion, considering Qaddafi is not a direct WMA threat to us in the same way Saddam was supposed to be.
so please, democrats, stand by your man and explain how this is ok. I'm pretty sure if Bush was the one doing this you guys would be frothing at the mouths like rabid, cursing, pentecostal gypsy witchdoctors.