User Tag List

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 72 of 72

Thread: Would you tattoo your baby/child?

  1. #71
    Senior Member Array Meek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011


    I met a 7 year old with a tongue piercing once on the boulevard near where I grew up. She even had parental permission on a piece of paper.
    The piercing shop was actually doing illegal piercings, though. I thought it was highly wrong and her tongue was hugely swollen, like her tongue was
    too small to be pierced. I wasn't sure but it did look horrible to me.
    I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious.-
    Albert Einstein

  2. #72
    Senior Member Array shoshana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011


    Quote Originally Posted by Lark View Post
    This is sort of a tangent from the other thread about prohibiting circumcision, I thought I would ask others about a practice I've only just heard about which is being picked up on the peripheral radar of family law and social services in the UK (predictably). I'll start with how I heard about it.

    It began with a picture advertising a tattooists in the neighbouring town which someone who I know is expecting posted on facebook of a baby with photoshopped tattoos on them. I asked them if they thought it was real or anyone would ever tattoo a baby, they said no it was only promo material but that they knew of cultures in which children, adolescents and adults get tattoos as a rite of passage. So at this point I was thinking that would be a good subject for a topical discussion and made the link with the other thread.

    However, I found out since then that there are families considering employing tattoos as child protection measures (this is where the authorities get involved, the trauma contra the possibly benefits, the law is also already pretty clear about the age at which people can receive tattoos and it isnt for minors) sort of like an indelibable ID in case of kidnap.

    I'm not sure there could be any benefit, I think of the sorts of people who kidnap and traffic kids as merciless and evil and would probably torturously remove any "tagging".

    The cultural question is a different one I think, if you prohibit a family from tattooing a child when all the rest of their family, peers and community do so you could be setting them up for social exclusion. I'm not sure that the state should usurp the authority or cultural practices of parents and families which are not neglectful, abusive or cruel towards their children.
    I'm pretty sure most tattoo artists wouldn't go near a person under 16 even if they were with a parent or guardian....

    on a side note i know depending on the tattoo ink color there are trace metals in the pigments... i wonder, depending on the age of the child, how the pigments would interact with a body that is undergoing such drastic changes in body chemistry.

    seems like a ridiculous notion to believe that tattooing an individual that is not old enough to consent to sex would ever be considered lawful (regardless of the intention to 'protect' the child).

Similar Threads

  1. Tattoo Advertising
    By Hate in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 04-18-2016, 12:57 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-21-2011, 07:45 AM
  3. couple lets baby starve to death while caring for virtual child
    By velocity in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-11-2010, 12:11 AM
  4. Angry Anderson of Rose Tattoo
    By Aphex in forum Popular Culture and Type
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-27-2010, 01:36 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts