User Tag List

123 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 29

  1. #1
    Oberon
    Guest

    Default Seventy-One Shots: The Death of Jose Guereña

    Seventy-One Shots: The Death of Jose Guereña

    Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik infamously railed in January of this year that Arizona is a “Mecca for prejudice and bigotry.”

    One must wonder if the “prejudice and bigotry” he considers endemic to Arizona is to blame for the death of U.S. Marine veteran Jose Guereña, killed when Dupnik’s deputies gunned him down in his home. They fired 71 shots. They hit him 60 times. And then, as if this wasn’t enough, Dupnik’s deputies blocked paramedics for an hour and 14 minutes from approaching the scene, denying Guereña treatment until he was assuredly dead.

    Dupnik’s SWAT team initially claimed that Guereña fired at them while they were serving a warrant — as he slept. They claimed that his bullets hit the bulletproof shield that the entry team hid behind, and that the barrage of bullets they fired back was in self-defense.

    Only, Guereña never fired his weapon. Awoken by his wife with screams that men with guns were invading his home and threatening his family, Jose Guereña armed himself with a AR-15 rifle and crouched in the hallway. The SWAT team unloaded upon Guereña on sight. He apparently recognized the home invaders as police. He took 60 rounds, but never — as the Pima County Sheriff’s Department was forced to admit — took off his weapon’s safety as he was being killed.

    Prejudice and bigotry?

    It was, you’ll recall, a claim Dupnik made in the wake of Jared Loughner’s bloodly rampage at a “Congress in your Corner” event at a Safeway supermarket in Tucson, where six were killed and 14 others were injured — including, gravely, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Dupnik was attempting to blame the conservative Tea Party movement for the shooting when he made the comment. And even after it was revealed that Loughner’s few known political views had been described as “quite liberal,” and were in fact muddled at best, he refused to retract his slur.

    So when Dupnik’s teams attempted a complicated four-house raid of minority families looking for drugs, perhaps bigotry and prejudice really was in play.

    Perhaps Dupnik’s officers assumed every Hispanic accused of being a drug dealer really was one, and perhaps they assumed that the tenant of a home protecting his loved ones must be a bloodthirsty cartel member waiting in ambush. Is that why they gunned down a tired, hard-working father sleeping off a night shift at the local copper mine? A Marine veteran of Iraq that had the discipline not to fire — a discipline that a trigger-happy SWAT team which has now killed three men in less than a year cannot itself exercise?

    Not only has the Pima Sheriff’s Department tried to justify firing 71 shots at one man in a small hallway, hitting him (thankfully, just him) 60 times in a home where his wife and child were present. They’ve attempted to justify their refusal to let a team of paramedics treat Guereña, who was still miraculously alive after being sprayed mercilessly with bullets. It takes a competent SWAT team just a handful of minutes to “clear” a residential home during a raid. Dupnik’s SWAT team refused to declare the scene “clear” for an agonizing one hour and 14 minutes, and not until Jose Guereña had already died.

    A cynic might be tempted to suggest Dupnik’s SWAT team was waiting for the only witness to their assault to die. Considering how the Sheriff’s Department has acted since they stormed the home, a rational person might be tempted to agree.

    Not content to blame the victim for his own death, they attempted to insinuate he was a drug dealer, even though they were forced to admit under direct questioning that no drugs were found in his home, and that a clumsy cop falling down may have triggered the bloodbath.

    Vanessa Guereña claims that neither she nor her husband heard the officers announce themselves as police. As anyone who has ever seen an episode of any popular police reality show knows, no entry team waits 15 seconds after announcing themselves to batter down a door and rush the inhabitants — as Pima County Lt. Michael O’Connor claims his SWAT team did. Identical scenes of immediate entry upon announcement (or after breaching), without giving those inside a chance to react, is a standard tactic captured again and again.

    Why Lt. Michael O’Connor decided to tell a mistruth about a well-known, heavily documented, and highly standardized technique isn’t immediately clear. Perhaps it is because of the inevitable wrongful death lawsuit to be filed against the Pima County Sheriff’s Department on behalf of Vanessa Guereña and her two children. Or perhaps it is because of the possible DOJ civil rights investigation. Perhaps Dupnik’s employees simply are unable to act any more professionally after a raid than they do during one.

    No-knock warrants are typically used to surprise the target of raids and keep them from disposing of evidence, with possible violence from the offender cited as justification for the military-style use of heavy armor and machine guns.

    Jose Guereña’s death was entirely preventable. Over-armed, over-amped law enforcement is causing far more harm to the public than other tactics and techniques possibly could.

    The over-militarization of law enforcement agencies and over-use of SWAT teams is an idea that needs to be revisited in a sane society. Too many good people have been traumatized, and too many killed, under the flimsiest of circumstances.

    After surviving two tours of duty in Iraq, only to lose his life in an encounter with Clarence Dupnik’s keystone cops, Jose Guereña was buried with full military honors.

  2. #2
    Post Human Post Qlip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    While I appreciate the sentiment. From what you said, the guy had an AR-15, was prepared to use it against SWAT, and most likely was expecting the heat to come down on him at any time. All that adds up to an earned death. I'd have to read more about it to decide if there was any kind of bigotry involved.

  3. #3
    Oberon
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qlippoth View Post
    While I appreciate the sentiment.
    Apparently you don't, not really...

    The Marine owned an AR-15, as you'll find many former-active-duty Marines do... particularly the ones who live in rough neighborhoods. However, if he had been prepared to use it against SWAT as you propose, I believe this combat veteran would have likely got off a round or two. Certainly his rifle would not still have had the safety on.

    Under the circumstances this man's death is to be expected. I propose to you not the premise that the cops were wrong for shooting him... their rules of engagement no doubt required them to open up on anyone in the house displaying a weapon... but that it was wrong for a SWAT team to even be there to begin with.

    Dynamic entry teams against civilians are abusive and bullshit unless there's a compelling reason why they're necessary. "Officer safety" isn't a sufficient concern; the Gestapo went home to their families at night too.

  4. #4
    Post Human Post Qlip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    I understand he was military, but that shouldn't make a difference. A lawfully owned AR-15 is a lawfully owned AR-15, civilian or not. And a crazy violent dangerous person is a crazy violent dangerous person, civilian or not. If I was on SWAT (hah, never) I would definitely pull some BS to keep myself from getting shot. It's all in the details, and situation.

  5. #5
    Oberon
    Guest

    Default

    As I mentioned, I cannot find fault with the cops for shooting this man once they were on the scene. Even if all he was guilty of were honest mistakes, there was only one way for this to end, and that was with the lone rifleman dead.

    What I object to is that a SWAT team was there in the first place. Why do we accept that there are dynamic entry teams composed of police combat specialists whose job it is to take people and evidence into custody, and kill anybody who won't come quietly?

  6. #6
    morose bourgeoisie
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    MBTI
    INFP
    Posts
    3,859

    Default

    It sounds like a set up.

  7. #7
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    14,031

    Default

    From what you said, the guy had an AR-15..... All that adds up to an earned death
    So you're saying I have an earned death too?

  8. #8
    Post Human Post Qlip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    MBTI
    ENFP
    Enneagram
    4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    9,488

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoBiscuit View Post
    So you're saying I have an earned death too?
    lol, Disco.. you edited my post into oblivion to be able to respond like that ^^^ I have a feeling D.C. is just the right place for you.

  9. #9
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    14,031

    Default

    I just wanted to make the point that possession of a firearm lends no weight to evidence of guilt or innocence.

  10. #10
    Emperor/Dictator kyuuei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    enfp
    Enneagram
    8
    Posts
    13,878

    Default

    I'll have to be with Disco on this one.. The more you're trained to be around firearms in the armed forces, the more comfortable you feel having one nearby. If I were not-white, in Arizona.. I'd probably own one for sure. Even right now, I live in a good neighborhood, and I keep weapons around everywhere. Most of them improvised, but I still take note of it. It is something you never shake--the appreciation of weaponry and the comfortable status you get into when having them..

    If my wife woke me up screaming people were in my house, it'd be the first thing I reached for. Natural reaction. I grab weapons sometimes just walking around normally. People don't take self-defense classes expecting to be in a fight.. they take them just in case there is one anyways.

    Even if he was an awful person, not abiding the law, and was ready to shoot the police--70+ shots is too much. It is ruthless overkill.. If an Iraqi person were lit up like that, bomb-gun-or-otherwise, we'd all be in jail for sure. If an Iraqi person in the midst of a war isn't allowed to be lit up like that, I don't at all see how it's allowed for this guy to be killed this way.
    Kantgirl: Just say "I'm feminine and I'll punch anyone who says otherwise!"
    Halla74: Think your way through the world. Feel your way through life.

    Cimarron: maybe Prpl will be your girl-bud
    prplchknz: i don't like it

    In Search Of... ... Kiwi Sketch Art ... Dream Journal ... Kyuuei's Cook book ... Kyu's Tiny House Blog ... Minimalist Challenge ... Kyu's Savings Challenge

Similar Threads

  1. Predict the death of the poster above you
    By foolish heart in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 1110
    Last Post: 11-13-2017, 12:41 AM
  2. The Death of God
    By Ginkgo in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 01:12 PM
  3. The Death of the Republican Party, Stardate Unknown
    By Wind Up Rex in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-08-2009, 01:58 PM
  4. Web 2.0 - the death of culture?
    By Langrenus in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-04-2007, 08:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO