User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5

  1. #1
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    14,031

    Default What's Wrong with America's Economy?

    Hopefully when we move on, this will be the primary topic.

    What's wrong with America's economy?
    Its politicians are failing to tackle the country’s real problems. Believe it or not, they could learn from Europe
    http://www.economist.com/node/18620710

    PESSIMISM about the United States rarely pays off in the long run. Time and again, when Americans have felt particularly glum, their economy has been on the brink of a revival. Think of Jimmy Carter’s cardigan-clad gloom in the inflation-ridden late 1970s, or the fear of competition from Japan that marked the “jobless recovery” of the early 1990s. Both times the United States bounced back, boosted on the first occasion by Paul Volcker’s conquest of inflation and on the second by a productivity spurt that sent growth rates soaring in the mid-1990s even as Japan stalled.

    That record is worth bearing in mind today. Americans are unhappy, and becoming more so, about their country’s prospects and politicians’ efforts to improve them. In a new New York Times/CBS News poll, seven out of ten respondents said America is on the wrong track. Almost 60% of Americans disapprove of Barack Obama’s handling of the economy, and three out of four think Congress is doing a lousy job.

    This malaise partly reflects the sluggishness of the recovery. Though unemployment has been falling and share prices are close to a three-year high, house prices are still in the dumps and the price of petrol has soared to levels not seen since the summer of 2008. But it’s not all about oil or indeed the short term. A careful reading of the polls suggests that Americans’ worries stretch well beyond the next couple of years: about stagnating living standards and a dark future in an economy slow to create jobs, saddled with big government deficits and under threat from China. Tellingly, a majority now regard China, not America, as the world’s leading economy.

    Are these worries justified? On the plus side, it is hard to think of any large country with as many inherent long-term advantages as America: what would China give to have a Silicon Valley? Or Germany an Ivy League? But it is also plain that the United States does indeed have long-term economic weaknesses—and ones that will take time to fix. The real worry for Americans should be that their politicians, not least their president, are doing so little to tackle these underlying problems. Three failings stand out.

    The competitiveness canard

    The first failing, of which Mr Obama in particular is guilty, is misstating the problem. He likes to frame America’s challenges in terms of “competitiveness”, particularly versus China. America’s prosperity, he argues, depends on “out-innovating, out-educating and out-building” China. This is mostly nonsense. America’s prosperity depends not on other countries’ productivity growth, but on its own (actually pretty fast) pace. Ideas spill over from one economy to another: when China innovates Americans benefit.

    Of course, plenty more could be done to spur innovation. The system of corporate taxation is a mess and deters domestic investment. Mr Obama is right that America’s infrastructure is creaking (see article). But the solution there has as much to do with reforming Neanderthal funding systems as it does with the greater public spending he advocates. Too much of the “competitiveness” talk is a canard—one that justifies misguided policies, such as subsidies for green technology, and diverts attention from the country’s real to-do list.

    High on that list is sorting out America’s public finances. The budget deficit is huge and public debt, at over 90% of GDP when measured in an internationally comparable manner (see article), is high and rising fast. Apart from Japan, America is the only big rich economy that does not have a plan for getting its public finances under control. The good news is that politicians are at last paying attention: deficit reduction is just about all anybody talks about in Washington, DC, these days. The bad news—and the second reason for gloom about what the politicians are up to—is that neither party is prepared to make the basic compromises that are essential to a deal. Republicans refuse to accept that taxes will have to rise, Democrats that spending on “entitlements” such as health care and pensions must fall. No real progress is likely until after the 2012 presidential election. And the antagonism of today’s deficit debate may even harm the economy, as Republicans push for excessive cuts in next year’s budget.

    When growth doesn’t bring jobs

    Meanwhile, the biggest dangers lie in an area that politicians barely mention: the labour market. The recent decline in the jobless rate has been misleading, the result of a surprisingly small growth in the workforce (as discouraged workers drop out) as much as fast job creation. A stubborn 46% of America’s jobless, some 6m people, have been out of work for more than six months. The weakness of the recovery is mostly to blame, but there are signs that America may be developing a distinctly European disease: structural unemployment.

    Youth unemployment is especially high, and joblessness among the young leaves lasting scars. Strong productivity growth has been achieved partly through the elimination of many mid-skilled jobs. And what makes this all the more worrying is that, below the radar screen, America had employment problems long before the recession, particularly for lesser-skilled men. These were caused not only by sweeping changes from technology and globalisation, which affect all countries, but also by America’s habit of locking up large numbers of young black men, which drastically diminishes their future employment prospects. America has a smaller fraction of prime-age men in work and in the labour force than any other G7 economy. Some 25% of men aged 25-54 with no college degree, 35% of high-school dropouts and almost 70% of black high-school dropouts are not working (see article).

    Beyond the toll to individuals, the lack of work among less-skilled men could have huge fiscal and social consequences. The cost of disability payments is some $120 billion (over 1% of GDP) and rising fast. Male worklessness has been linked with lower marriage rates and weakening family bonds.

    All this means that grappling with entrenched joblessness deserves to be far higher on America’s policy agenda. Unfortunately, the few (leftish) politicians who acknowledge the problem tend to have misguided solutions, such as trade barriers or industrial policy to prop up yesterday’s jobs or to spot tomorrow’s. That won’t work: government has a terrible record at picking winners. Instead, America needs to get its macro-medicine right, in particular by committing itself to medium-term fiscal and monetary stability without excessive short-term tightening. But it also needs job-market reforms, from streamlining and upgrading training to increasing employers’ incentives to hire the low-skilled. And there, strange as it may seem, America could learn from Europe: the Netherlands, for instance, is a good model for how to overhaul disability insurance. Stemming the decline in low-skilled men’s work will also demand more education reform to boost skills, as well as a saner approach to drugs and imprisonment.

    Technology and globalisation are remaking labour markets across the rich world, to the relative detriment of the lower-skilled. That’s why a rosier outlook for America’s economy does not necessarily mean a rosy future for all Americans. Mr Obama and his opponents can help to shape the process. Sadly, they are doing so for the worse rather than the better.
    Last edited by Bellflower; 04-28-2011 at 01:47 PM. Reason: Moved from a completely unrelated thread.

  2. #2
    Tempbanned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Enneagram
    8w9
    Posts
    14,031

    Default

    Lol, this was supposed to be attached to another thread.

    Oh well.

  3. #3
    The Eighth Colour Octarine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    MBTI
    Aeon
    Enneagram
    10w so
    Socionics
    LOL
    Posts
    1,366

    Default

    I think this is worth discussing in a new thread. Anyway, what was the Netherlands model for overhauling disability insurance?

    With regards to the low skill job market, do we have any economists here? The problem is that there is a lack of demand for (the creation of) low skilled jobs, something that merely lowering the minimum wage won't fix. But there are also those who could potentially be trained for useful skills, but are rejected due to large holes on their resume. Now these holes don't necessarily have to be due to prison time - they could be due to ill health etc. But the fact is that employers are reluctant to take them on for traineeships and apprenticeships.
    There is also a distinct lack of employment opportunities for those with disabilities - the reality is that they are usually more expensive to hire and this isn't always offset by greater loyalty.
    The second problem is lack of opportunities for older individuals.The fact is that to reduce the deficit, Americans need to be working as long as they can physically do so. With improvements in health and life expectancy, we can no longer afford to have a significant proportion of the populace retiring (and therefore contributing little to production in the economy), while they are still more than capable of doing their old job and then proceeding to live another 16+ years. This is an area that the USA is actually doing better than its European peers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirem...ific_countries
    I think in the future, the age pension may be changed so that it is only given to those who have substantially reduced employment capacity.

  4. #4

    Default

    Capitalism.

    Capitalism is what's wrong.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Architectonic View Post
    I think this is worth discussing in a new thread. Anyway, what was the Netherlands model for overhauling disability insurance?

    With regards to the low skill job market, do we have any economists here? The problem is that there is a lack of demand for (the creation of) low skilled jobs, something that merely lowering the minimum wage won't fix. But there are also those who could potentially be trained for useful skills, but are rejected due to large holes on their resume. Now these holes don't necessarily have to be due to prison time - they could be due to ill health etc. But the fact is that employers are reluctant to take them on for traineeships and apprenticeships.
    There is also a distinct lack of employment opportunities for those with disabilities - the reality is that they are usually more expensive to hire and this isn't always offset by greater loyalty.
    The second problem is lack of opportunities for older individuals.The fact is that to reduce the deficit, Americans need to be working as long as they can physically do so. With improvements in health and life expectancy, we can no longer afford to have a significant proportion of the populace retiring (and therefore contributing little to production in the economy), while they are still more than capable of doing their old job and then proceeding to live another 16+ years. This is an area that the USA is actually doing better than its European peers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirem...ific_countries
    I think in the future, the age pension may be changed so that it is only given to those who have substantially reduced employment capacity.
    I've bolded the part that's interested me recently. I was reading about how the children of the rich have problems as a consequence of the opportunities presented by family wealth and prosperity, the often reach their thirties without any sort of specialisation or commitment exhibited in their CVs, as a result they look like "dabblers" and while they probably have been living their life, trying different things and pursuing fufilment they are not going to be considered a good bet by most of the employers which their parents have made their wealth working for. The flexible labour market is a myth for the worker/producer.

    The point about the low skills economy is a good one, it doesnt get a look in in any objective way, especially to conservative and libertarian economists who are content with the explanation that people are lazy and would develop high skills if their welfare/living depended on it. I dont think so. Although I think some of the better right wing political economists like Samuel Britan and Charles Murray are coming around to the idea with things such as citizens incomes or annual stipends replacing all existing welfare state agencies or services.

Similar Threads

  1. What's wrong with hypocrisy?
    By Athenian200 in forum The Bonfire
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 01-31-2009, 02:15 PM
  2. What's wrong with a little deflation?
    By ygolo in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 11:05 PM
  3. What is Wrong with Economy
    By wildcat in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-31-2008, 09:15 AM
  4. [MBTItm] What's wrong with being an xNTJ, anyway?
    By Enyo in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 02:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO