Like I said, your "proof" is from heavily biased sources. It would be like citing from the Christian Science Monitor or Bitch magazine. You got these articles from places which heavily slant to a particular point of view. It's not like you're posting raw data.
I don't see that you've actually offered proof of anything, quite frankly, other than you can't make the distinctions between socialism, capitalism, democracy, and a social democracy.
You essentially look like a rabid anarcho-capitalist to me, not unlike a red paint throwing vegan.
I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, but you say you aren't upset, and make attempts to thwart people's opinions based upon their age.
Your overall tone is very much steeped in rhetoric and emotional appeals, like Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh or some crazed activist from the liberal side.
That's why I don't feel inspired to give you any sources, as I also believe what we're saying to you is pretty much self-evident and you're just ignoring it because it doesn't suit your world view.
You can't show me an example of a nation where Austrian economic theory has met with success in reality, because it's never happened, so demanding proof is really a moot point.