Even if over 95% were male in these professions (and I don't think they are), calling everyone in the profession one of the last set of terms is inaccurate when compared to the first set of terms.
Calling a completely anonymous member of these professions by the second set of terms is presumptuous (why I was referring to the fallacy of accident).
I suspect completely domineering women would have the same problems as completely domineering men.
I have yet to see adults of either gender want to have complete control, or be completely submissive in a relationship.
Still, I see the general common sense of having female guards for female inmates and male guards of male inmates. (Though what do you do about varied sexual orientations?)