lol. You make it sound as though you have presented some kind of evidence to prove this statement to be true but really you have not proven anything. I can stand by my arguments because I have shown how smoking fits with the definition of inalienable rights. I have not seen any argument that discredits these definitions because they are the universally excepted definitions.
You have posted some statements that seem to have no basis such as "There are only two inalienable rights - the right to life and the right to liberty." But where did that come from? What definition are you using in order to claim that? How did you arrive at that conclusion? I'm only pointing this out because until you can effectively show me your reasoning I can never accept them as truths. I could only assume that they sounded good so you posted them.