User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

  1. #1

    Default Sphere of Interest Vs. Sphere of Influence

    In politics the sphere of interest of any individual will always be very different from the sphere of influence, for instance someone may have a very great interest (most ideologies deal with society or even the whole of humankind or the planet completely) but they will only be able to influence a hand full of individuals (boring their friends and family with their views, posting on a forum :-s ) or conversely they could be totally disinterested by control a swing vote.

    What's your views on how this corresponds to typology or even if its a genuine or useful conceptualisation of politics?

  2. #2
    IRL is not real Cimarron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ISTJ
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Posts
    3,424

    Default

    "How this corresponds to typology?"
    You can't spell "justice" without ISTJ.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cimarron View Post
    "How this corresponds to typology?"
    Would a particular types have greater or smaller considerations of their sphere of influence relative to their sphere of interest, would they define each differently, would an extravert influence more people or less, would an interavert have a greater or smaler sphere of interest.

  4. #4
    IRL is not real Cimarron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    MBTI
    ISTJ
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Posts
    3,424

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lark View Post
    In politics the sphere of interest of any individual will always be very different from the sphere of influence...
    ...if its a genuine or useful conceptualisation of politics?
    I'd think it to be a very important part of the conceptualisation of politics, as it hits on the framework of the purpose of politics itself. Yes, I think it's genuine and valid, because the issue must* be confronted in every politician's career (or even any voter or adviser or ideologue). Deeming it useless/irrelevant (or not) will change the process of political and social development because of a change in the basic assumptions about that process.

    People are probably aware of their impact on the political process in widely varying degrees, because of many factors...Typology would probably be one of them.

    * = I guess not always "must," and that's part of the point of your thread, isn't it?
    Last edited by Cimarron; 12-20-2009 at 10:08 AM. Reason: reading my response
    You can't spell "justice" without ISTJ.

Similar Threads

  1. [NF] INFJ romantic interest vs friend zone
    By dreamer03 in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-07-2017, 04:25 AM
  2. [NT] INTP vs ENTP. War of objectivity!
    By Magic Poriferan in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 331
    Last Post: 10-20-2010, 12:18 PM
  3. The Influence of Functions on Grammar
    By JustDave in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-29-2008, 11:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO