Holy shit! I must say I never expected to this much discussion. Gone for barely one day and already onto 9 pages!
Sadly I'm not in the position or mood to really comment on what has been said thus far. And frankly I usually notice that once a debate of mine has snowballed, it's better to take a back seat and let others fight it out.
I will say that as far as the basic argument that there's shallow atheists and shallow theists. Yes, but one of the major points stressed by atheists nowadays is how they're supposedly more intelligent and deeper thinkers than the stupid masses who still cling to religion. I've already called into question the validity of this argument, and even if true - it still doesn't prove atheism is the correct position. So other than to stroke their own egos, this argument makes no sense.
That was the one argument made by the OP; despite all the cockiness for supposedly being more brilliant, many of their arguments against religion are in the end very shallow, especially when compared to the more thoughful perspectives provided by numerous religious thinkers.
The issue is not about intelligence vs stupidity; but one of truth vs untruth.