This is the problem with scientific language, because the words are fixed to readings of certain measurements;- but measurements are not necessarily facts, and they can never shown to be, because if their subject's extant were fully understood, there would be no reason for it to be measured in the pursuit of any qualitative [intellectual] purpose.
In short; data =/= fact.
Faith is better appraised by the heart of understanding
and reasoning is better served by deduction.
What is the way of induction?
There is no good faith! Lets just follow along with whatever instruments we manage to concoct; as we continuously propound jargon in support of yet a greater reading of something even more subtle and imperceptible: something so subtle in fact- it can never be understood! Which is why we have computers to model it all for us; who knows what the f**k is really going on- but if you want some idea, its got something to do with these super strings [or I'm not quite sure what the latest fad is according to those math geeks]...