Chiharu
New member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2011
- Messages
- 662
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 7w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
I actually have more respect for this kind of "argument" than for when Christians (or people of other faiths) try to present their beliefs as logical. I understand and accept that not everything is governed by logic, but if someone is going to claim their position is logical, it has to stand up to that style of scrutiny.
I think the problem is that both arguments (having proof v. needing proof) are solid arguments. Neither side can really refute the other side's claim. So there isn't much point in debate unless you have an individual who has decided that they need or do not need proof of a deity's existence. Otherwise, you eventually settle at an impasse.