User Tag List

12311 Last

Results 1 to 10 of 171

Thread: Feminism SUCKS.

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    4w5
    Socionics
    bad
    Posts
    198

    Angry Feminism SUCKS.

    I think most of theories of them is CRAP.
    Basically,they always claim "peaceful female and violence male",I think it's nonsense.
    Just because the target of female violence usually is very weak and can't not resist and talk,I think they just good at calculate the success rate of their violence.
    Here is some examples:




    I googled picture keyword "fur",most of people wearing it are female.

    Oh,most of infanticide criminals are female.And these victims can't talk. I usually heard locale news about "found dead rotten infant body"...I guess this time I don't post than image is better than I post.
    Personally,I met a lot of verbal violence and insult by those people who claim themselves are feminists just because I don't want to join into them.Even Muslims didn't act like that way.
    I am such a traitor...bah!
    I am very sure the verbal violence by female far more than verbal violence by male.

    Based on my personal values and these evidence,I don't think female is "peaceful".
    I know some of authoritarian countries,like Russia,North Korea,China,most female in these countries like their authoritarian regimes much more than male...

    I found a logic issue,the human education system is controlled by female more than male.The mothers,kindergarten/primary school teachers,if they are suppose the values of gender equality,they should instill their gender equality values to children,but I didn't see that way.
    Reminding those authoritarian regimes...

  2. #2
    likes this gromit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6,652

    Default

    I wouldn't say feminists necessarily categorize women to be less violent than men.
    Your kisses, sweeter than honey. But guess what, so is my money.

  3. #3
    Senior Member cafe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    MBTI
    INFJ
    Enneagram
    9w1
    Socionics
    INFj None
    Posts
    9,827

    Default

    I dunno. I like not being considered property, having a right to an education, being allowed to own property and to vote, etc.
    “There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.”
    ~ John Rogers

  4. #4
    Senior Member prplchknz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    MBTI
    yupp
    Posts
    29,776

    Default

    uh such ignorance of the OP if he actually knew what the original definition of feminism was than he might have something constructive to say.
    In no likes experiment.

    that is all

    i dunno what else to say so

  5. #5
    Senior Member Scheherezade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5
    Posts
    156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gromit View Post
    I wouldn't say feminists necessarily categorize women to be less violent than men.
    Feminism is about women rights,
    having women considered less violent i think it comes from them generally having less physical strength than men, thus creating this.

  6. #6
    reflecting pool Typh0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Socionics
    ILI Ni
    Posts
    3,090

    Default

    No feminist I've met, be they male or female, consider feminism to be a definition. Not any more than Lenin cosidered Commuism to be a defintion.

  7. #7
    Klingon Warrior Princess Patches's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    MBTI
    ISTJ
    Enneagram
    6w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    5,312

    Default

    I've certainly felt this way about some militant/radical feminists - but that's how it works with ANY ideology, really. Extremists tend to make the whole movement look bad. Whether that be related to feminism, religion, politics, whatever. We have a ton of feminists on this forum who are perfectly reasonable people with perfectly reasonable ideas about feminism.

    And this is coming from a girl who harbors some slightly misogynistic tendencies.

    You completely lost me at the fur coat thing. You swipe some pictures of paid professional models wearing fur jackets and somehow make a connection between them and feminism? You know that just because they're female doesn't make them feminists, right?
    “Everybody has a secret world inside of them. All of the people of the world, I mean everybody. No matter how dull and boring they are on the outside, inside
    them they've all got unimaginable, magnificent, wonderful, stupid, amazing worlds. Not just one world. Hundreds of them. Thousands maybe.” -Neil Gaiman

    ~

  8. #8
    Temporal Mechanic. Lexicon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    MBTI
    JINX
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/sx
    Posts
    5,740

    Default

    The fur "evidence" is a weak point to support your post, imo. We've used animal products for food/clothing/tools for ages. We being the human race in general. Look up leather and there'll be plenty of men & women alike using it. Handbags, wallets, footwear, clothes, car/furniture upholstery, tool handles.. The list goes on. Not to mention, a lot of fur used on men's clothing tends to be inside (big coat liners, etc). Anyway, I'm sure none of those broads went out and clubbed baby seals, haha. Just as I never ran a wild turkey down with my car to eat it (ok, I really wanted to before, but it was only once). I think making the illogical connection between females/violence and the use of animal skins might easily group you into an extremist category, yourself. Some people may immediately think of those red paint-tossing "FUR IS MURDER!" PETA wackos, which would detract from whatever point you were initially trying to make. Hard to take extremists seriously.



    I do think you have a valid complaint, either way, that sometimes the non-physical (& some physical) violence women are capable of can be overlooked. I don't believe feminism itself has much to do with that misconception- it's most likely stemmed from the "weaker sex" gender role we have in most societies, as well as the fact that we do objectively have less muscle mass than men- which is associated with strength- which can be associated with violent capacity/aggressiveness. I would say it's about equal on all fronts with both genders, in the end. Women perhaps have less of a penchant for assault of a sexual nature, but they can control/shame/humiliate/cause others pain and get high on it, just as easily as any unstable male. An adult of either sex can cause a great deal of harm without a lot of muscle mass, one way or the other.

    Anyone imposing their personal beliefs on you by force is an asshole, male or female, but that's just my opinion (ha). I don't have patience for retarded extremism regarding any value system [be it feminazi's or people of various obnoxious religions/lack thereof].. a lot of these people are rendered incapable of being peaceful when their starkly contrasting realities are challenged by even the mere presence of non-believers. There will be self righteous indignation, outrage, and hostility, as that reality is being threatened by the dissonant sounds of your/my/anyone else's own thoughts. What a needless mess. Blegh.

    That stated, I don't think all feminist beliefs/efforts could be grouped into that^ category. Thankfully.

    Like I said, there are people in every position who will take stereotypical beliefs to the extreme/take advantage of situations that reinforce their ideals. The best thing to do is try not to feed it. But ey- if it's *really* bugging you (someone's just in-your-face about it constantly)-- you can always just have fun with it. Make extremely oblivious, subtly misogynistic observations/commentary/act surprised by their reactions when they go off on you/try to hold it in for awhile because they think you're too stupid to even understand. No, it doesn't "solve" anything, but you might as well enjoy yourself.
    03/23 06:06:58 EcK: lex
    03/23 06:06:59 EcK: lex
    03/23 06:21:34 Nancynobullets: LEXXX *sacrifices a first born*
    03/23 06:21:53 Nancynobullets: We summon yooouuu
    03/23 06:29:07 Lexicon: I was sleeping!



    04/25 04:20:35 Patches: Don't listen to lex. She wants to birth a litter of kittens. She doesnt get to decide whats creepy

    02/16 23:49:38 ygolo: Lex is afk
    02/16 23:49:45 Cimarron: she's doing drugs with Jack

    03/05 19:27:41 Time: You can't make chat morbid. Lex does it naturally.

  9. #9
    philosopher wood nymph greenfairy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    MBTI
    iNfj
    Enneagram
    6w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    4,042

    Default

    This argument is not effective against feminism.

    True some versions of feminism can contain some hypocritical and destructive beliefs, but that does not invalidate the whole philosophy. If you believe women are equally as valuable as men and should be treated as such...sorry but you're a feminist.

  10. #10
    Theta Male Julius_Van_Der_Beak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    MBTI
    CROW
    Enneagram
    5w6 sp/so
    Socionics
    LII None
    Posts
    9,039

    Default

    Feminism doesn't suck. Feminism is kind of awesome actually. I dunno, I don't want to date women who are all trying to fit some dull cookie-cutter model of what a woman should be. Also, done intelligently, it helps men, too.

    It's just that some people who consider themselves feminists are kind of annoying, and aren't interested in interacting with men as individuals, but rather "men" as a group. That's not how it's supposed to work. Feminism is supposed to compete against, among other things, treating women not according to their talents and qualities and individuals, but as a group of "women".
    [Trump's] rhetoric is not an abuse of power. In the same way that it's also not against the law to do a backflip off of the roof of your house onto your concrete driveway. It's just mind-numbingly stupid and, to say the least, counterproductive. - Bush did 9-11


    This is not going to go the way you think....

    Visit my Johari:
    http://kevan.org/johari?name=Birddude78

Similar Threads

  1. [SP] Top 3 reasons for why SPs suck...
    By The Ü™ in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)
    Replies: 205
    Last Post: 01-07-2013, 09:58 AM
  2. [NT] Top Three Reasons For Why INTs Suck
    By Haight in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 773
    Last Post: 08-29-2012, 06:57 AM
  3. [SJ] Top 3 reasons for why SJs suck...
    By The Ü™ in forum The SJ Guardhouse (ESFJ, ISFJ, ESTJ, ISTJ)
    Replies: 192
    Last Post: 04-05-2011, 07:21 PM
  4. [NF] Top 3 reasons for why NFs suck...
    By The Ü™ in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 132
    Last Post: 12-24-2008, 04:20 AM
  5. [MBTItm] Intuitards: Do all Sensors suck?
    By sassafrassquatch in forum The SP Arthouse (ESFP, ISFP, ESTP, ISTP)
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 11-22-2007, 09:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO