• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

The Limitation of Power

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
We have found that once we get the politics right, most things follow along.

But how do we get the politics right?

Well, we start with the premise that power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And so the corollary is that the limitation of power will limit corruption.

And as it is not possible to abolish power, we limit power with power. This is called the Separation of Powers. And is the basis of liberal democracy.

Of course liberal democracy is a work in progress, and we are still managing to limit physical power in the military and the church. As I write military and church rapists are coming subject to a Royal Commission.

But although we have had some success in limiting physical power, we have hardly begun to address the limitation of emotional power.

We have though made a start in limiting emotional power by recognising the hidden culture of emotional aggression in girls, and by criminalising the purchase of sex, at least in Sweden.

So altough the liberal democratic project of limiting power has had some historical succeses, we still have miles to go before we sleep.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,569
We have found that once we get the politics right, most things follow along.

But how do we get the politics right?

Well, we start with the premise that power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And so the corollary is that the limitation of power will limit corruption.

And as it is not possible to abolish power, we limit power with power. This is called the Separation of Powers. And is the basis of liberal democracy.

Of course liberal democracy is a work in progress, and we are still managing to limit physical power in the military and the church. As I write military and church rapists are coming subject to a Royal Commission.

But although we have had some success in limiting physical power, we have hardly begun to address the limitation of emotional power.

We have though made a start in limiting emotional power by recognising the hidden culture of emotional aggression in girls, and by criminalising the purchase of sex, at least in Sweden.

So altough the liberal democratic project of limiting power has had some historical succeses, we still have miles to go before we sleep.

No, no, no Victor.

You're writing like there's never been any economic analysis of anything, EVER, plus what about socialism? Huh? What was that about? I read this and think that hundreds and hundreds of years of history and experience has just been forgotten about.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
No, no, no Victor.

You're writing like there's never been any economic analysis of anything, EVER, plus what about socialism? Huh? What was that about? I read this and think that hundreds and hundreds of years of history and experience has just been forgotten about.

I confess when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, I thought socialism was over.

Then came the book, "The Black Book of Communism", by a group of French, socialist historians telling us that Marxism took the lives of 100,000 of their own people over a period of 70 years. And I thought socialism was dead and buried.

And in the meantime millions upon millions have been lifted out of extreme poverty by capitalism in Asia.
 

UniqueMixture

New member
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
3,004
MBTI Type
estj
Enneagram
378
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
No, no, no Victor.

You're writing like there's never been any economic analysis of anything, EVER, plus what about socialism? Huh? What was that about? I read this and think that hundreds and hundreds of years of history and experience has just been forgotten about.

Victor is an optimist. However Lark I fear you have nostalgia for days past so because the world is trending away from that you're a pessimist. Don't worry, there is still room in the future for the type of family you grew up in and love so much, it's just the way it's expressed will be slightly different.
 
G

Ginkgo

Guest
Power doesn't corrupt. Power attracts pathological, corruptible personalities, many of whom wish to use their power to limit the power of others.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
Power doesn't corrupt. Power attracts pathological, corruptible personalities, many of whom wish to use their power to limit the power of others.

This is a semantic response to the great political discovery of the Enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries in the West.

Such a response diminishes the discovery as well as the responder.
 
G

Ginkgo

Guest
This is a semantic response to the great political discovery of the Enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries in the West.

Such a response diminishes the discovery as well as the responder.

We can't "diminish" a discovery anymore than we can "diminish" power.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
We can't "diminish" a discovery anymore than we can "diminish" power.

I make it a habit not to enter arguments with members. And I particulary don't enter semantic arguments.

And I don't enter semantic arguments because they conceal more than they reveal. In other words, semantic arguments are dishonest.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,569
I confess when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989, I thought socialism was over.

Then came the book, "The Black Book of Communism", by a group of French, socialist historians telling us that Marxism took the lives of 100,000 of their own people over a period of 70 years. And I thought socialism was dead and buried.

And in the meantime millions upon millions have been lifted out of extreme poverty by capitalism in Asia.

So when do you think they'll write the black book of capitalism or is what they say about victors writing history true?
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,569
Victor is an optimist. However Lark I fear you have nostalgia for days past so because the world is trending away from that you're a pessimist. Don't worry, there is still room in the future for the type of family you grew up in and love so much, it's just the way it's expressed will be slightly different.

I'm not sure that optimism and pessimism has much to do with it.

The reality is that Victors posts and knowledge base is ALL classical liberal, there's a great deal of almost obsessive effort going into ensuring fidelity to that thinking since its emerged as Victor's leitmotif or central plank (remember the more confused Muslim baiting and anti-feminism?).

The problem with most of those who do this is that they really dont know about or simply dismiss the hundreds of years of criticism in theory and practice of classical liberalism that there's been, conservative, socialist and other (nationalism, ecologism, feminism, fascism). I've come to understand that its a wilful ignorance and there's not real drive or desire to know any different, as mentioning sloppy partisan "history" like the black book of communism is indicative, its a case of "dont trouble me with any sort of doubt or skepticism".
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
I'm not sure that optimism and pessimism has much to do with it.

The reality is that Victors posts and knowledge base is ALL classical liberal, there's a great deal of almost obsessive effort going into ensuring fidelity to that thinking since its emerged as Victor's leitmotif or central plank (remember the more confused Muslim baiting and anti-feminism?).

The problem with most of those who do this is that they really dont know about or simply dismiss the hundreds of years of criticism in theory and practice of classical liberalism that there's been, conservative, socialist and other (nationalism, ecologism, feminism, fascism). I've come to understand that its a wilful ignorance and there's not real drive or desire to know any different, as mentioning sloppy partisan "history" like the black book of communism is indicative, its a case of "dont trouble me with any sort of doubt or skepticism".

The proof of the pudding is in the eating and liberal democracy has delivered the abolition of institutional slavery for the first time in history, and the emancipation of women and the prosecution of child sexual abuse.

These are the runs on the board and we are still at the crease.

You ask about economics, well for the first time in human history scarcity has been overcome in the West and developed countries. And many millions have been lifted from absolute poverty in Asia.

Science, technology and modern medicine flourish.

And all liberal democratic countries have signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

And to boot, the incidence of war is diminishing year by year.

And good God, Lark, the Queen has apologised to the Irish.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,569
The proof of the pudding is in the eating and liberal democracy has delivered the abolition of institutional slavery for the first time in history, and the emancipation of women and the prosecution of child sexual abuse.

You think that's down to liberal democracy?

These are the runs on the board and we are still at the crease.

You ask about economics, well for the first time in human history scarcity has been overcome in the West and developed countries. And many millions have been lifted from absolute poverty in Asia.

Science, technology and modern medicine flourish.

And all liberal democratic countries have signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

And to boot, the incidence of war is diminishing year by year.

And good God, Lark, the Queen has apologised to the Irish.

Good God?

Anyway, Victor the economies which have prospered in the third world or Asia have been the economies which have, for ideological reasons, convictions or historical legacies, been able to refuse to adopt classical or neo-liberl economics wholesale and instead have cherry picked what to adopt and what to dispense with.

Asia's success is attributable to merchantilism and the governing elite's willingness to play the long game economically rather than to seek short term gains or wins at the expense of the country or their people like those nations in Africa whose leaders where sold a pup by the Bretton Woods system or used their status to take massive loans, move them into off shore accounts and flee the country.

I've heard some seriously daft things in my time and seen some scamming but to just choose every single thing you think is good in life and tie it all into a single political creedo is nye on ridiculous, you're bound to see yourself just how much that resembles the proselytising preacher or born again believer that you're so fond of attacking?
 
G

Ginkgo

Guest
The proof of the pudding is in the eating and liberal democracy has delivered the abolition of institutional slavery for the first time in history, and the emancipation of women and the prosecution of child sexual abuse.

These are the runs on the board and we are still at the crease.

You ask about economics, well for the first time in human history scarcity has been overcome in the West and developed countries. And many millions have been lifted from absolute poverty in Asia.

Science, technology and modern medicine flourish.

And all liberal democratic countries have signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

And to boot, the incidence of war is diminishing year by year.

And good God, Lark, the Queen has apologised to the Irish.

We might progress a little if we accept that as just the past.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
but to just choose every single thing you think is good in life and tie it all into a single political creedo is nye on ridiculous?

Well, feel free to criticize my ideas. You are well read and well motivated and I may well be wrong.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,284
We might progress a little if we accept that as just the past.

The abolition of poverty in Asia is happening right now and Oz is in the thick of it.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is now in contention with 57 members of the United Nations rejecting the Declaration.

In the Eastern hemisphere we are progressing at enormous speed.

So naturally I am trying to bring you up to speed.
 

Cellmold

Wake, See, Sing, Dance
Joined
Mar 23, 2012
Messages
6,266
Always the cheap and low personal attack masquerading as humour.

Cant it be both? I find it funny and you seem to find it insulting.

Regardless I am surprised you took it personally. I could easily say : Always the cheap and low tactic of excusing a lack of self deprecation using overt seriousness.
 
Top