User Tag List

First 1234 Last

Results 21 to 30 of 40

  1. #21
    Analytical Dreamer Coriolis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    5w6 sp/sx


    There are two aspects to the use of these terms. The first is accuracy. Does the person you are calling "retarded" really have this mental disability, or are you using the term to insult someone for doing something you disagree with? Does the "socialist" really hold political views consistent with that philosophy, or is he just not a dyed-in-the-wool Republican?

    Assuming the term is accurate, it becomes a question of sensitivity. There are no objective criteria here, just the sensibilities of those using and hearing the terms. Reasons for finding one term or another offensive vary, and as someone else already observed, it is not always those in the labelled group that take greatest offense.
    I've been called a criminal, a terrorist, and a threat to the known universe. But everything you were told is a lie. The truth is, they've taken our freedom, our home, and our future. The time has come for all humanity to take a stand...

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2009


    Hooray for the first amendment.

    I'm of the opinion, especially in this day and age, that people generally should have thicker skins.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Viridian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010


    Quote Originally Posted by SuchIrony View Post
    I think no matter what term you use, someone will be offended by it. There isn't a way around it. You can use a more politically correct term but even some of the politically correct terms someone could find offensive and then what are you going to replace it with?
    Mmm... Maybe "offended" isn't quite the word I was looking for. I meant more along the lines of "hurt", like someone who is disabled and keeps hearing words that describe them used to describe bad things throughout their whole life - not the Internet White Knights that point their pointy fingers at George Takei when he's giving a mouthful to gay bashers because he said "douchebag" (true story).

    I guess that, if I'm not a good person, I might as well try to settle for "nice"...
    Tentative typing: ISFJ 6w5 or 9w1 (Sp/S[?]).

  4. #24


    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoBiscuit View Post
    Hooray for the first amendment.

    I'm of the opinion, especially in this day and age, that people generally should have thicker skins.
    Perhaps but assholes shouldnt use freedom as a flag of convenience to carry on being assholes either.

  5. #25
    Superwoman Red Herring's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    5w4 sp/sx


    Quote Originally Posted by Lark View Post
    Perhaps but assholes shouldnt use freedom as a flag of convenience to carry on being assholes either.
    Well put, Sir.
    The good life is one inspired by love and guided by knowledge. Neither love without knowledge, nor knowledge without love can produce a good life. - Bertrand Russell
    A herring's blog
    Johari / Nohari

  6. #26


    Quote Originally Posted by Red Herring View Post
    Well put, Sir.
    I once read that when Orwell fought for freedom of speech he couldnt care less about pornography, that's probably my opinion, although I'll be honest that it also grinds my gears when I hear or witness anti-social behaviour of the worst kind and it all excused by freedom. Its really running the concept into the ground.

  7. #27
    Blah Orangey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008


    Doesn't it seem kind of simple-minded to say that because you can't come up with black and white rules about which terms are offensive to whom and when, that you just simply can't be bothered to think about it at all?

    I mean, I don't think anybody likes it when people self-righteously try and prescribe what you can and cannot say or else you're a horrible racist/sexist/homophobe/transphobe/ableist, but that doesn't mean the opposite - that you should be thoughtless about the language you use, because you personally feel that no one should be offended by words - is any more legitimate a prescription.
    Artes, Scientia, Veritasiness

  8. #28

  9. #29


    As I read that, I was preparing to be offended.

  10. #30
    & Badger, Ratty and Toad Mole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    Ableism and Moralism

    Ableism is simply moralism.

    And it is important to remember that propaganda is neither good nor bad, neither true nor false. Rather, propaganda is plausible or implausible.

    And the besetting sin of propagandists is to believe their own propaganda.

    So if we believe ableism is good, then we are committing the sin of believing our own propaganda.

Similar Threads

  1. Language and Gender
    By Coriolis in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 08-10-2013, 12:47 AM
  2. Body language and personality type?
    By curiousel in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-24-2011, 08:32 AM
  3. Language and the mind.
    By Athenian200 in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 04-25-2011, 09:26 PM
  4. Directive language and communication.
    By CrystalViolet in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-16-2011, 01:01 PM
  5. Languages and psychology
    By Virtual ghost in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 09:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO