She used the chart I gave you.
Yeah, but...
Well, see, here's the thing...
Maybe she just used a chart, and did the interpreting completely by herself.
Rex knows a lot about astrology (more than me), so she might've just done that.
But she also might've gotten a full profile, read it, figured out what was more and less relevant, and then given you her analysis.
That's really the best way to go about things, because the machine, as I said, just spits out information.
It has no idea what it's doing.
It's not a conscious being.
There is no interpreting.
Just a formula, with canned interpretations.
It doesn't know how to present to you what is really most important in our chart.
(A program could potentially be developed to get close to that, but none of them, as of yet, do that.)
(And, even then, the methodologies for doing so would still be limited, as conscious interpretation is really kind of necessary.)
This is largely because, as you said in your post before this one, it is indeed flawed to simply look at each piece of your chart in isolation.
It's what makes interpreting this stuff so complex (and that's not just obfuscation to make astrology more non-falsifiable than it really is).
It really makes complete sense why, if astrology is true, then this is how it would work.
The way to think of it is like combining colors (or, when you consider all the parts of your chart, like I said before: a kaleidoscope).
But, if we're using just two colors, out of let's say 8 different possible colors, then think of the following issue:
If two people both have blue as one of their colors, but one has yellow as their other, and the other has red as their other, then, when you combine the first person's, you get green, but when you combine the second person's, you get purple.
Green and purple, very different from one another.
But both of them had
blue as half their "chart".
Half of their underlying material was the exact same, but the final picture ended up
extremely different, because the other half of the underlying material was different for each person.
The same principle holds true for astrology, but you're dealing with something like 138 colors, I believe.
(that astromatrix site was actually the first to ever break it down that way, that I have seen.)
(and the way it breaks it down, giving an image to each aspect: super cool. i love it.)
And then, you're not just dealing with combining just two colors out of those 138, but usually like 25-30.
And then, you're not just dealing with equal amounts of each color thrown in, but certain colors are gunna have more weight (due to orbs, and other reasons), and others less.
That's how complex astrology gets.
I'd say I'm pretty damn versed in personality psychology, and astrology, if it's true, is hands down the most complex system of personality psychology there is.
Frankly, nothing else we have is even remotely close.
And, on top of it, I have found it, not only for myself, but for others as well, to be extremely accurate.
One has to go into it, though, with an open mind, or one will get absolutely nothing out of it.
It could be bunk, it could all just be forer effect, but not necessarily.
And unless one gives it a genuine and legitimate shot, and learns how it all actually supposedly works.
Then one real has no idea what they're talking about, as it's an extremely complex and subtle system, and cannot be understood, nor legitimately written off,
without learning about it from the inside,
as it understands itself, AND THEN coming to some kind of judgment.
