User Tag List

First 34567 Last

Results 41 to 50 of 81

  1. #41
    Per Ardua Metamorphosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007


    Quote Originally Posted by Lark View Post
    Do you believe that there is a real, absolute and obejctive evil in existence or is it just all a projection of peoples worst or wickednest traits by themselves onto an "other"?

    Jung said both of these things, without considering there to be a seeming contradiction. Some how I think he is right, that it could be both but I'm not sure how I resolve the seeming contradiction.
    I absolutely do not believe in an absolute objective evil. It seems to me that when something is referred to as evil, what they really mean is "not in the interest of humanity and/or myself."
    "You will always be fond of me. I represent to you all the sins you never had the courage to commit."

    Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office
    than to serve and obey them. - David Hume

  2. #42
    Senior Member KDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010


    Quote Originally Posted by Spurgeon View Post
    The Bible does explain the hows and whys. One's inability to understand it (or unwillingness to accept it) says nothing about the veracity of it's claims.

    Also, it seems you've really missed the point in regard to Jacob . He is not being commended for wrestling with God. It's to his shame. In fact, he gets his hip put out of joint as a reminder of who is really in charge. And actually, that was an act of mercy, considering that God could have utterly destroyed him.
    Jacob himself understood that, thus his response: "For I have seen God face to face, and yet my life has been delivered."

    I could go on and on about the fallacies in your arguments, but suffice it to say, you are interpreting scripture from a human-centered point of view rather than a God-centered one. Therein lies the whole problem.

    In fact, the concept of absolute Good and Evil is not hard to understand, it's just hard to accept, because it implies moral responsibility to an absolute authority.

    Thankfully, all one must do to gain a real understanding of these things is to stop trying to place themselves above God and surrender to him.

    No, if this God wanted to simply remind people he was in charge, then he wouldn't have wasted his time like that. The story has him fighting him an entire night. That he injured his hip is a reminder, yes. I never said that Jacob won or that it even could be won. I'm saying that he simply struggled.

    The whole ordeal was ultimately not a "punishment". Jacob insisted that he not leave and to give him his blessing - and immediately following this, God gave him a unique role and name. The one who struggles with God.

    I can't help but think the god in this story liked the relationship. Maybe he found it refreshing. In any case, it's one of the few things that seperates the bible's deity from others. Rewarding that kind of struggle. Every other god wants unquestioning obedience. If you want to reduce it to that, be my guest..but then, you wouldn't be any different serving any under god under the sun. Another tool. Good luck on that.

  3. #43


    Quote Originally Posted by Qlip View Post
    Yeah, I can relate to this. Yeah, once you brand something as objectively evil.. it doesn't matter how or why it exists, all that is left to do is to destroy it, because it implies that there is nothing left to understand. I'm not going to say that there isn't something out there that isn't actually the very embodiment of evil.. there are a lot of things out there.
    Yeah, that's my view pretty much. Not that occasions wont arise when humans have become evil and are irredeemable. The only solution then is to firebomb Dresden.

  4. #44
    Starcrossed Seafarer Aquarelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010


    I don't believe that any sort of physical manifestation or quanitfiable "force" of evil exists in the world outside of humans' perception of something as "evil." I do believe there are certain actions that are almost always evil, such as murder and rape, but I wouldn't necessarily say they are objectively evil because there is always a shade of gray. Like euthanasia is technically murder, but I don't think it's evil. (I can't think of any way that rape wouldn't be evil, but there could be.)
    Last edited by Aquarelle; 11-02-2011 at 09:35 AM.
    Masquerading as a normal person day after day is exhausting.

    My blog:
    TypeC: Adventures of an Introvert

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008


    Evil is in the eyes of the beholder.

  6. #46
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007


    That word just isn't up my alley. It's moralizing BS.
    If I use it, it's in jest.

  7. #47


    Quote Originally Posted by Metamorphosis View Post
    I absolutely do not believe in an absolute objective evil. It seems to me that when something is referred to as evil, what they really mean is "not in the interest of humanity and/or myself."
    Well that definitely would be a subjective assessment and projection, what you're describing there.

    Some of the interesting things I've watched and read lately about, of all things (well it was halloween) the devil, have suggested that originally angels where terrifying in their pursuit of what was unequivocally good, although not necessarily in mankinds interest, the devil, or rather Satan, appears to have originally been some kind of God's own regulator as opposed to a mischievious sprite or meddler.

  8. #48
    & Badger, Ratty and Toad Mole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008

    The Line in the Sand

    The closest we have come to absolute evil in the West was the Shoah.

    And in response to the Shoah we signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    However fifty-seven Islamic States, the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) have openly and publicly rejected the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    So the West met near absolute evil in the Shoah, and we turned our faces resolutely against evil.

    Unfortunately the OIC have embraced evil, particularly anti-semitism, the oppression of women, inequality before the law, and child abuse.

    So the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the line we have drawn in the sand.

  9. #49
    Senior Member niffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    8w9 sx/sp


    Objective? No.

    People's values are based on very subjective personal preference -- the concepts of "good" and "bad" are ones contructed by humans.
    sparkly sparkly rainbow excretions

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatGirl View Post
    holy shit am I a feeler?
    if you like my avatar, it's because i took it myself! : D

  10. #50
    @.~*virinaĉo*~.@ Totenkindly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    594 sx/sp
    LII Ne


    Quote Originally Posted by KDude View Post
    The whole ordeal was ultimately not a "punishment". Jacob insisted that he not leave and to give him his blessing - and immediately following this, God gave him a unique role and name. The one who struggles with God.
    Yeah, I think there's a lot that people want to label "black or white," "good or evil" that is simply part of human experience and the maturation process. People are fallible and works in progress, and we're constantly being challenged, realigning our thoughts and understanding of the world, and growing. I guess if one wants to see the hip thing as a "punishment" for hubris, then they can read it that way, but I believe that also flattens JHWH's character here as well. Marring someone to that degree simply to punish them for defiance isn't much different than slashing up a child's face for misbehaving; that's a shame-creating stigma that is carried for life, not an act of mercy or redemption. It's humiliating and painful and destructive... and would ironically probably more along the lines of "evil" than anything else.
    "Hey Capa -- We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"

    “Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 36
    Last Post: 10-18-2013, 02:24 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-12-2011, 04:33 PM
  3. Psychological Functions and objectivity/subjectivity
    By KLessard in forum Philosophy and Spirituality
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-21-2010, 05:32 PM
  4. Subjectivity and Objectivity in Type
    By benos in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-08-2010, 05:42 PM
  5. Internet Forums, 'Real Life', and Personality distortion
    By Members Only in forum General Psychology
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 07:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO