Victor, you tell us not to take your word for it and to check Wikipedia, but Wikipedia certainly does NOT support your claim that Carl Jung was "an enthusiastic and active supporter of the Nazis." There is an entire section at Wikipedia called "Jung and Nazism." which readers can visit here:
Carl Jung - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'll just paraphrase the facts, as they are currently stated at Wikipedia:
1) Yes, Jung was editor of the Zentralblatt für Psychotherapie, a publication that eventually endorsed Mein Kampf as required reading for all psychoanalysts.
However, Jung claims he accepted the position with the support of his Jewish friends and colleagues in an effort to save the practice of psychoanalysis, which he believed the Nazis would abolish as a "Jewish science."
2) Yes, Jung served as president of the Nazi-dominated International General Medical Society for Psychotherapy.
However, one of Jung's first acts as president was to modify the constitution so that German Jewish doctors could maintain their membership as individual members even though they were excluded from all German medical societies. Jung later resigned from the position during the war.
3) In 1943 Jung aided the Office of Strategic Services by analyzing Nazi leaders for the United States.
4) In an interview with Carol Baumann in 1948, published in the Bulletin of Analytical Psychology Club of New York, December 1949, Jung explicitly denies rumors regarding any sympathy for the Nazi movement, saying, "It must be clear to anyone who has read any of my books that I have never have been a Nazi sympathizer and I never have been anti-Semitic, and no amount of misquotation, mistranslation, or rearrangement of what I have written can alter the record of my true point of view."
This does not sound to me like "enthusiastic and active" support for the Nazis, and it comes from the very source Victor tells us to rely on.
.
