• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

(A)theism and Art

Eruca

78% me
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
939
MBTI Type
INxx
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Gosh darn Jennifer. Stop saying what I mean to say but more succinctly.

I'm too tired for this.
 

Beorn

Permabanned
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,005
To defend the agnositc-atheist view:
The fact beauty and our feelings of beauty are explainable does not undermine their beauty.


You're missing the point. It doesn't matter that things are explainable. My point is that there is a metaphysical property to things that is actually present and that is beauty. That science can explain emotional responses to certain stimuli is besides the point.



By "perception based" I feel you mean to say that the atheist is like an animal eating sweet fruit, he gorges on the perception he finds so tasty, only taking pleasure at its most base level. You mean to say, I believe, that the atheist will not take what is called "spiritual" pleasure from things. But there is no reason to believe this. I believe kindness is beautiful, and so would feel emotionally touched to see an act of kindness. This is even when I know kindness honouring kindness might not be defend able logically, save for utilitarian reasons.

I mean that there is no spiritual quality actually present to observe within the materialist framework. If you act as if there is then you are being inconsistent.

I believe that so many atheists are inconsistent on this point, because there actually is a spiritual component of the world that cannot be ignored.


To criticise the Christian world view:
I fully believe that a Christian can see the world in such a way. But, when you say that something possesses "intrinsic" qualities you base that belief on God, which is also your subjective belief. Why cant an atheist also have a subjective belief that, say, something is beautiful?

I use the term intrinsic for a reason. Something that is intrinsic is not based on subjective opinion. I don't care about the subjective. I care about the real. The intrinsic quality of beauty only exists if there is a God.
 

Beorn

Permabanned
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,005
So you're saying you need to "make up" some reason (AKA divine participation) for you to accept life as beautiful, because otherwise you would be a nihilist and would see any form of beauty or happiness as a complete lie. (That is the rational basis you are arguing on right now.)


I don't want anyone to "make up" anything. I want people to discover truth and not lie to themselves. If you are being inconsistent you are definitely lying to yourself
 

iwakar

crush the fences
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
4,877
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Contininuing in the vein of art derail

The intrinsic quality of beauty only exists if there is a God.

Preposterous! Now to me, this perspective is bleak and unimaginative. Even in my religious heyday, I wasn't narrow enough to think that myself and other Christians had a monopoly on experiencing the beauty in life over everyone else.


Mods: is it possible to slice out the art derail into a new thread or is it too muddled?
 

Eruca

78% me
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
939
MBTI Type
INxx
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
You're missing the point. It doesn't matter that things are explainable. My point is that there is a metaphysical property to things that is actually present and that is beauty. That science can explain emotional responses to certain stimuli is besides the point.


I mean that there is no spiritual quality actually present to observe within the materialist framework. If you act as if there is then you are being inconsistent.

I believe that so many atheists are inconsistent on this point, because there actually is a spiritual component of the world that cannot be ignored.


I use the term intrinsic for a reason. Something that is intrinsic is not based on subjective opinion. I don't care about the subjective. I care about the real. The intrinsic quality of beauty only exists if there is a God.

It is far passed my bed time and I have to go to bed. I really hope someone else will continue for me on my side of this.

What I will say is I find your representation of the atheist world view as materialistic highly misleading. Brief definition of materialistic:

"Materialistic describes a person who is markedly more concerned with material things (such as money and possessions) rather than spiritual, intellectual, or cultural values."

Even if we exclude the atheist from the spiritual arena, which I believe would be most unfair, we can still firmly claim they can concern themselves with cultural and intellectual values. You should take your reference to atheists as materialists out, it simply isn't true.

*edit* I see I need not worry over support. Just as well I'm going then, otherwise poor Beef would be shockingly outnumbered. ;<
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I don't want anyone to "make up" anything. I want people to discover truth and not lie to themselves. If you are being inconsistent you are definitely lying to yourself

You're missing my point.

You have no external verification that your beliefs are real; and you just stated that those who do not share your beliefs are unable to experience real beauty.

What else am I supposed to logically get out of your comments, other than that you need to believe what you believe in order to experience beauty and meaning in the world, and otherwise you do not see any beauty or meaning?

(From a rational perspective, you should believe in something because it is "true" as the main criteria, NOT based on what benefits the belief in question happens to provide you. Rationals believe in things regardless of how good or bad the truth is; whatever is true is whatever is true, and that's really the end of it.)

But I'm pretty aware at this point that you don't really get how people can experience beauty and love and wonder in the world without having to ascribe some underlying meaning to it; you just basically negate their perceptions by saying it's all fake.
 

Beorn

Permabanned
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,005
Oh, really? I believe that you believe that. I can see for myself what is beautiful and what is not. Anything else is just like, your opinion, man.

Do you all not understand what intrinsic means???

Preposterous! Now to me, this perspective is bleak and unimaginative. Even in my religious heyday, I wasn't narrow enough to think that myself and other Christians had a monopoly on experiencing the beauty in life over everyone else.

The judgements without careful reading in this thread are really frustrating.

There is a difference between saying intrinsic beauty is dependent on the existence of God, which is what I said, and saying that experience of beauty is dependent on belief in God, which I did not say.

It is far passed my bed time and I have to go to bed. I really hope someone else will continue for me on my side of this.

What I will say is I find your representation of the atheist world view as materialistic highly misleading. Brief definition of materialistic:

"Materialistic describes a person who is markedly more concerned with material things (such as money and possessions) rather than spiritual, intellectual, or cultural values."

Even if we exclude the atheist from the spiritual arena, which I believe would be most unfair, we can still firmly claim they can concern themselves with cultural and intellectual values. You should take your reference to atheists as materialists out, it simply isn't true.

*edit* I see I need not worry over support. Just as well I'm going then, otherwise poor Beef would be shockingly outnumbered. ;<

I presumed people in this thread knew the difference between the materialism you refer to in the above quote and philosophical materialism.


I don't know if I continue in this discussion if I'm going to have to continue to defend myself on these sorts of levels. It's exhausting.
 

Beorn

Permabanned
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,005
You're missing my point.

You have no external verification that your beliefs are real; and you just stated that those who do not share your beliefs are unable to experience real beauty.

What else am I supposed to logically get out of your comments, other than that you need to believe what you believe in order to experience beauty and meaning in the world, and otherwise you do not see any beauty or meaning?

(From a rational perspective, you should believe in something because it is "true" as the main criteria, NOT based on what benefits the belief in question happens to provide you. Rationals believe in things regardless of how good or bad the truth is; whatever is true is whatever is true, and that's really the end of it.)

But I'm pretty aware at this point that you don't really get how people can experience beauty and love and wonder in the world without having to ascribe some underlying meaning to it; you just basically negate their perceptions by saying it's all fake.

You're missing my point and you are completely misinterpreting what I'm writing. None of what you write above is true about my position. I don't know why I expected more from you.
 

Beargryllz

New member
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
2,719
MBTI Type
INTP
Do you all not understand what intrinsic means???

From within, I suppose. Often times, something beautiful is simultaneously unique, that property sets it apart entirely from every other object. Even if the object could be replicated, it would only affirm it's importance by it's expanding presence in the universe. If it can inspire, it has power.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
There is a difference between saying intrinsic beauty is dependent on the existence of God, which is what I said, and saying that experience of beauty is dependent on belief in God, which I did not say.

Fine. Let's go back to your original comment.

I don't care what colorful and emotional language you use the bottom line is that in a materialist world beauty is perception based. You perceive something to be beautiful because of a random colliding of chemicals in your brain. Within a Christian worldview beauty is an intrinsic quality possessed by both God and created things. When we view something as beautiful we are recognizing it's intrinsic value not merely experiencing a chemically stimulated emotional response.

What on earth is "intrinsic beauty"?
Is there any objective basis for your type of "intrinsic beauty" that makes it more valid than another perspective?
And how is your "intrinsic beauty" differ from atheists/agnostics who also would claim that life is intrinsically beauty but just define it differently?

I don't know if I continue in this discussion if I'm going to have to continue to defend myself on these sorts of levels. It's exhausting.
It certainly is.

(And, actually, with this, I think I'm done... because it's clear you don't like challenges to your assumptions, and also it has become rather than fleshpile and I do feel bad about that part, even if you sort of got yourself into it...)

You're missing my point and you are completely misinterpreting what I'm writing. None of what you write above is true about my position. I don't know why I expected more from you.

Because typically you've thought I'm reasonable, but right now you're apparently not in the mood to be challenged. (I mean, really, though -- if you're going to make comments the way you did in this thread, what do you expect? Or make up words like "intrinsic beauty" and use them outside the unquestioning church system? You're going to have people challenge you.)

@Iwakar: What would you like separated out?
(One reason it hasn't been separated is because it's been confusing to even know what the core thread is. It's not an easy split.)
 

Beorn

Permabanned
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
5,005
Because typically you've thought I'm reasonable, but right now you're apparently not in the mood to be challenged.

Anyone who has consistently read my posts know that I have no problems being challenged. I'm just tired of explaining simple things to people that are so stuck in there own belief system that they can't conceive of what the world would be like outside of it and consequently are very ungenerous in there appraisal of other belief systems.

Yes, you read that last line correctly.
 
Top