I wonder sometimes if some of the plain spoken historical accounts of ancestors are not a work of condescention?
I mean I've been listening to a history of the world in 100 objects and they describe the discover of mirrors in a sacred pond in Asia, the historian describes how "there was a belief that there was a God in the lake", I wonder if its as simple as that, if such ideas would appear unreal or silly to us today would they not have appeared similarly so to people in the past?
I dont know, it just seems like most modernist accounts flatter themselves and make ancestors appear like superstitious idiots, those same ancestors managed to survive, transmit culture and institutions to future generations and have left much in the way of archeology, history, mythology and artifacts which I dont think our present age can or will leave similarly to others.
I mean I've been listening to a history of the world in 100 objects and they describe the discover of mirrors in a sacred pond in Asia, the historian describes how "there was a belief that there was a God in the lake", I wonder if its as simple as that, if such ideas would appear unreal or silly to us today would they not have appeared similarly so to people in the past?
I dont know, it just seems like most modernist accounts flatter themselves and make ancestors appear like superstitious idiots, those same ancestors managed to survive, transmit culture and institutions to future generations and have left much in the way of archeology, history, mythology and artifacts which I dont think our present age can or will leave similarly to others.