• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Condescention and ancestors?

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,568
I wonder sometimes if some of the plain spoken historical accounts of ancestors are not a work of condescention?

I mean I've been listening to a history of the world in 100 objects and they describe the discover of mirrors in a sacred pond in Asia, the historian describes how "there was a belief that there was a God in the lake", I wonder if its as simple as that, if such ideas would appear unreal or silly to us today would they not have appeared similarly so to people in the past?

I dont know, it just seems like most modernist accounts flatter themselves and make ancestors appear like superstitious idiots, those same ancestors managed to survive, transmit culture and institutions to future generations and have left much in the way of archeology, history, mythology and artifacts which I dont think our present age can or will leave similarly to others.
 

LeafAndSky

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
307
MBTI Type
ISFP
I wonder sometimes if some of the plain spoken historical accounts of ancestors are not a work of condescention?

I mean I've been listening to a history of the world in 100 objects and they describe the discover of mirrors in a sacred pond in Asia, the historian describes how "there was a belief that there was a God in the lake", I wonder if its as simple as that, if such ideas would appear unreal or silly to us today would they not have appeared similarly so to people in the past?

I dont know, it just seems like most modernist accounts flatter themselves and make ancestors appear like superstitious idiots, those same ancestors managed to survive, transmit culture and institutions to future generations and have left much in the way of archeology, history, mythology and artifacts which I dont think our present age can or will leave similarly to others.

At the county fair the other day, walking through the barn with all the varieties of chickens, my companion remarked on how stupid chickens are.

Domesticated, I said. Cows, too. The wild ones were a lot smarter.

Suddenly I thought, Probably people now are the domesticated version of wild ancestors. I think I'm so intelligent and my ancestors were less so? In all likelihood, it's the opposite!
 

The_Liquid_Laser

Glowy Goopy Goodness
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
3,376
MBTI Type
ENTP
Our ancestors were total morons simply because their worldview was different from ours. ;) In spite of being genetically no different we are much smarter today. :D ;)
 

LeafAndSky

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
307
MBTI Type
ISFP
Our ancestors were total morons simply because their worldview was different from ours. ;) In spite of being genetically no different we are much smarter today. :D ;)

;)

"We are the greatest city,
the greatest nation:
nothing like us ever was."

-- Carl Sandburg, Four Preludes on Playthings of the Wind

About "being genetically no different," though . . . have you read the latest on genetics and genetic change? What you/we/anyone learned in school no longer applies.

Anyway, intelligence is a debatable or problematic concept however you look at it.
 
Top