• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

The "Easy" Problem

ragashree

Reason vs Being
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
1,770
MBTI Type
Mine
Enneagram
1w9
2 + 2 = ?


Any philosophical thoughts on how to go about this one?
 

spin-1/2-nuclei

New member
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
381
MBTI Type
INTJ
well I could start by trying to debate the nature of the symbol used for the number 2 and given that each individual perceives the world differently how can we even be sure that each person experiences the symbol the same way... or even that anyone else is really here?

Yeah.. that's all I got.. nobody will ever accuse me of being a philosopher.. :)
 
O

Oberon

Guest
Assuming the common contemporary definitions of your terms, the answer is as follows:

2 + 2 = 4

If your definitions differ, your answer may also. :D
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
2 + 2 = ?


Any philosophical thoughts on how to go about this one?

Thats not a problem, just a question. Please define the problem and we can decide if its easy or not ;)
 

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I would find a calculator, however, I don't feel like getting up at the moment :cheese:
 

ragashree

Reason vs Being
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
1,770
MBTI Type
Mine
Enneagram
1w9
I think this thread is an excellent starting point. A fount of philosophical perspicuity if ever there was one.
I'm sure Coberst would have something interesting and pertinent to contribute, if he was really human ever actually responded to threads in the manner in which he starts them.

well I could start by trying to debate the nature of the symbol used for the number 2 and given that each individual perceives the world differently how can we even be sure that each person experiences the symbol the same way... or even that anyone else is really here?

Yeah.. that's all I got.. nobody will ever accuse me of being a philosopher.. :)

This is a promising start nevertheless, it provides some definite foundational material to build further complications of the issue upon.

It equals "nothing that will pay the rent" in some of the ghettos around here.
:rofl1: :yes:

Is there a bridge nearby that you could jump off? That might clear your mind of the incessant flood of non-sense.:hi:
:dont: This raises the question "To jump or not to jump?" It's an equally valid and interesting one, but offtopic for this thread. Maybe you could start a new one on it if it interests you that much?

Assuming the common contemporary definitions of your terms, the answer is as follows:

2 + 2 = 4

If your definitions differ, your answer may also. :D
Since when does philosophy rely on mere common contemporary definitions? Philsophical activity would cease if recieved wisdom was never to be questioned!

Thats not a problem, just a question. Please define the problem and we can decide if its easy or not ;)
That's what we're working on ;)
 
O

Oberon

Guest
Since when does philosophy rely on mere common contemporary definitions?

It doesn't... but the conventional answer is an appropriate jumping-off point for forays into how the answer changes when the common contemporary definitions are altered. My answer wasn't the end of the discussion... it was the beginning.
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
That's what we're working on ;)

Ok, problem is you dont know how to add. If you did why would you be asking that question? To prove I know the answer? But in that case what is the problem? Do you need to rely on me for my knowledge? Why would you need to rely on me? Is it because you dont know how to add? Why wouldnt you know how to add? Have you ever tried figuring it out on your own? Why havnt you tried figuring it out on your own? Is it even possible to figure that out on your own. Its just symbols. Its not like someone handed you 2 sets of things and asked how many you had. How do you even figure out what symbols mean unless you have more to go on. Is that even a question in the first place.

:D
 

Arthur Schopenhauer

What is, is.
Joined
May 1, 2010
Messages
1,158
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5
What? Each symbol represents some imaginary number of imaginary objects.

2 = 2 objects. So, 2+2=4?

What's going on I here?
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
What? Each symbol represents some imaginary number of imaginary objects.

2 = 2 objects. So, 2+2=4?

What's going on I here?

But why is 2+2=? even a problem? Its not really a problem at all unless you dont know how to add. But even in that case WHY do you need to know what 2+2 is. That is the real problem. Follow the why's backward. The person who asked you what 2+2 is may be nothing more then what they think they need to do to solve the problem, so 2+2 is actually a part of the solution not the problem...what is the problem?

edit: soory if my wording comes out jumbled. English is my native language, but language is not my native way of thinking.
 

ragashree

Reason vs Being
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
1,770
MBTI Type
Mine
Enneagram
1w9
It doesn't... but the conventional answer is an appropriate jumping-off point for forays into how the answer changes when the common contemporary definitions are altered. My answer wasn't the end of the discussion... it was the beginning.

:yes: :newwink:

Ok, problem is you dont know how to add. If you did why would you be asking that question? To prove I know the answer? But in that case what is the problem? Do you need to rely on me for my knowledge? Why would you need to rely on me? Is it because you dont know how to add? Why wouldnt you know how to add? Have you ever tried figuring it out on your own? Why havnt you tried figuring it out on your own? Is it even possible to figure that out on your own. Its just symbols. Its not like someone handed you 2 sets of things and asked how many you had. How do you even figure out what symbols mean unless you have more to go on. Is that even a question in the first place.
See? It is a problem, precisely because of the lack of context. Your questions begin to identify the difficulties this causes. Are you doubting your own ability to find a solution without further information yet?
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
:yes: :newwink:


See? It is a problem, precisely because of the lack of context. Your questions begin to identify the difficulties this causes. Are you doubting your own ability to find a solution without further information yet?

No, I am just playing. A problem has yet to be defined. Do you see the problem with that line of thought I went through?
 

Bamboo

New member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
2,689
MBTI Type
XXFP
My dad famously (in my family circle) referred to math as "mental masturbation."

What's your point here?
 

ragashree

Reason vs Being
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Messages
1,770
MBTI Type
Mine
Enneagram
1w9
No, I am just playing. A problem has yet to be defined. Do you see the problem with that line of thought I went through?

Many :) Now the question is, which one is most pertinent?
 

Oaky

Travelling mind
Joined
Jan 15, 2009
Messages
6,180
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
2 + 2 = ?


Any philosophical thoughts on how to go about this one?
Alright, I'm quite bored anyway.

We can say the "?" Exists as an unknown entity that can be revealed through means of logically reconfiguring what it equals to. Or if one is too lazy to do that one can simply substitute the "?" with what it equals to therefore solving by means of allowing the original entities to stay as they are.

There are an infinite number of ways to reconfigure the known entities and it is by common human expectation to choose the one that exists as a single entity in the numerical sense known as the sum.

It is therefore comfortable to announce that to solve the "?" entity one must find the sum of the existing entities already known.

2 + 2 = 4
 

Little_Sticks

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
1,358
2 + 2 = 4
2^2 = 4

2 + 2 = 4 = 2^2

Thus

2 + 2 = 2^2

3 + 3 = 6
3^3 = 27

3 + 3 != 3^3

Thus

2 + 2 = 2^2 and is special and unique :)

So to answer the philosophical question, you are 2 + 2 and are a special and a unique person :)

retardedicecream1wg3.jpg
 
Top