User Tag List

First 234

Results 31 to 33 of 33

  1. #31
    Geolectric teslashock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    MBTI
    ENTP
    Enneagram
    7w6
    Posts
    1,690

    Default

    You guys are all idiots.

    2 + 2 = 22

    (lolz is this thread for real?)

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    MBTI
    STP
    Posts
    10,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by teslashock View Post
    You guys are all idiots.

    2 + 2 = 22

    (lolz is this thread for real?)
    "2"+"2"="22"

    Its all dependent on what type of object we are talking about. 2 without quotatoin marks is automatically cast to an int type not a string.

    I ran through this same thing with my son when he would ask me what 5 and 5 is. Of course when I asked him what "and" means he got all confused and I wasnt able to explain good enough for him to comprehend at that age addition vs concatentation. Not to mention the logical use of the word "and".

    Its what happens when someone is learning addition at the same time they are learning to recognize numbers that contain 2 digits. What is 2 and 2, well use your fingers...1..2..3..4 So 2 and 2 is 4, yes, so 22 is the same thing as 4?

    Then the future complications kick in 22 and 22 is 8(depends) or 4 and 4 is 44(which that one actually makes sense) so 4 can be 22, but 22 may not be 4. So 22 is actually the same thing as 4 when we shift contexts and then shift back.

    edit: for this to make sense we must assume that "and = and" which can lead to "addition = concatenation" which in some cases could be true.
    Im out, its been fun

  3. #33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poki View Post
    I dont study the relationship between logic and speech. I study the speech itself and the logistics within the speech. This is how I listen and understand. What I do goes beyond if X then Y, or If not A then not B. Its not mathematical logic. I dont study logic, I practice logic.
    Certainly a lot can be picked up from speach beyond what can easily be placed in formal logic. But I believe that eventually, we will be able to put all of that into code (the formal logic otherwise known as software).

    But I get what you are saying. It is more of an instinctual grasp of the logic of the situation. That's how I opperate too. However, I have been trained to fairly readily translate that instinctual grasp into formal terms.

    Accept the past. Live for the present. Look forward to the future.
    Robot Fusion
    "As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance." John Wheeler
    "[A] scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." Richard Feynman
    "[P]etabytes of [] data is not the same thing as understanding emergent mechanisms and structures." Jim Crutchfield

Similar Threads

  1. Long - the quotes of lovable larrikin, Nobel physicist Richard Feynman
    By InsatiableCuriosity in forum Science, Technology, and Future Tech
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-02-2010, 11:18 PM
  2. Following the Trend...S/N Problems
    By Orangey in forum What's my Type?
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-11-2010, 08:36 AM
  3. The Split Brain function problem
    By sculpting in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive Functions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 09:04 AM
  4. Naomi Klein: What the hell is her problem, anyway?
    By pure_mercury in forum Politics, History, and Current Events
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 05:37 PM
  5. A very easy math problem I can't do
    By FDG in forum Academics and Careers
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-28-2008, 10:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO