I think we're even, since you're also missing my point.
Now where did I hear that before? Impossible for today is possible for tomorrow.
I strongly believe in the law of accelerating change, and I think recurring paradigm shifts help us to reach our goals faster. Even if you don't, in case we don't destroy ourselves in a few hundred years, we will eventually reach this stage of scientific development. There is not a single non morality-based criticism able to disprove this theory.
Positive variances presumed to foster the evolution of humans will be welcomed though, I'm sure.